- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > 英文書
- > Politics / International Relations
Full Description
This book examines the role of the cultural factor, and patterns of its interaction with social, economic and political developments, in fostering identity-based new populisms and various forms of political authoritarianism across the globe.
Comparing authoritarianism in the Asian and Western context, this book attempts to shed light on the different ways in which new political actors make use of cultural traditions or constructs in order to justify their claims to power and challenge the culture of modernity as understood in the Western world. Lastly, the book focuses on the consequence of these new challenges for multilateral cooperation at regional and global levels, asking the question: is the world going towards fragmentation and anarchy or a pluralist and innovative form of multilateral cooperation?
This book will be of key interest to scholars and students of populism and authoritarianism studies, democracy, global governance and more broadly to international relations.
Contents
Foreword. Introduction. Part I: Competing Modernities and Models of Modernization 1. Multiple modernities and anti-modernism today 2. Nation-building in the era of populism and the Muslim intelligentsia: The case of Indonesia 3. Can we explain multiple modernities? Suggested insights and their test in a South American context 4. Time, modernity, and the resurgence of right-wing populism Part II: The EU and China: Diverse Identities and Political Prospects 5. Modernization and modernity: Authoritarianism with Chinese characteristics 6. The Political Identity of Europeans and the challenges of the time after modernity Part III: Challenges for a Common Agenda of a New Multilateral Convergence 7. Multiple modernities in a multipolar and multiregional world: Some conditions for an interregional dialogue 8. The crisis of the Western liberal order and the rise of the new populism 9. Populism, globalization, and future world order 10. Conflicting liberties and modernities in comparative perspective. Conclusion
