Description
Debating Libertarianism offers readers a sustained debate between two leading political philosophers over which vision of society--Rawlsian left-liberalism or libertarianism--is best and most just. In this crucial and timely book, Samuel Freeman and Jason Brennan consider both fundamental questions of justice and issues of applied policy. Along the way, they debate which economic rights people have; whether democracy liberates people and is essential for social equality, or is merely a tool to promote justice; the justification and extent of property rights and of taxation; whether the fact that freedom permits people to make bad choices is a reason to limit freedom; and whether the modern welfare state is necessary for social justice or instead a barrier to it. Debating Libertarianism offers readers both a succinct defence and critique of two important conceptions of what makes institutions just and good.
Table of Contents
PART 1: The Case AgainstSamuel FreemanIntroductionChapter 1: Liberalism and LibertarianismChapter 2: Ideal Libertarianism and the Orthodox ViewChapter 3: Liberal LibertarianismChapter 4: Neoliberalism--the Intersection of Classical Liberalism and LibertarianismChapter 5: High Liberalism and Distributive JusticePART 2: The Case ForJason BrennanIntroductionChapter 6: Rawlsian Liberalism: Why NotChapter 7: Why Not Libertarianism?Chapter 8: Anti-Social Democracy: A Libertarian Left-Wing CritiquePART 3: ResponsesChapter 9: Response to BrennanChapter 10: Response to FreemanPart 1 BibliographyPart 2 BibliographyIndex
-
- 洋書電子書籍
- アリストテレス『修辞学』（英訳・オック…
