トマス・モアの裁判:研究と史料<br>Thomas More's Trial by Jury : A Procedural and Legal Review with a Collection of Documents

個数:

トマス・モアの裁判:研究と史料
Thomas More's Trial by Jury : A Procedural and Legal Review with a Collection of Documents

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 260 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9781843836292
  • DDC分類 942.052092

基本説明

This book challenges the recently established consensus that the trial was a carefully prepared and executed judicial process in which the judges wewe amenable to reasonable arguments. The book concludes with an edition and translation of the pertinent documents of the trial. An appendix gives a dramatic reconstruction of the trial in light of the above analyses.

Full Description

This book challenges the recently established consensus that the trial was a carefully prepared and executed judicial process in which the judges were amenable to reasonable arguments.

Thomas More's treason trial in 1535 is one of history's most famous court cases, yet never before have all the major documents been collected, translated, and analyzed by a team of legal and Tudor scholars. This edition serves asan important sourcebook and concludes with a 'docudrama' reconstructing the course of the trial based on these documents.
Legal experts H. A. Kelly and R. H. Helmholz take different approaches to the legalities of this trial, and four experienced judges [including Justice of the Queen's Bench Sir Michael Tugendhat] discuss the trial with some disagreements - notably on the meaning and requirement of 'malice' called for in the Parliamentary Act of Supremacy. More's own accounts of his interrogations in prison are analyzed, and the trial's procedures are compared to and contrasted with 16th-century concepts of natural law and also modern judicial practices and principles.
The book is a 'must read' not only for students of law and Tudor history but also for all concerned with justice and due process. As a whole, the book challenges Duncan Derrett's conclusions that the trial was conducted in accord with contemporary legal norms and that More was convicted only on the single charge of denying Parliament the power to declare Henry VIII Supreme Head of the English Church [testified to by Richard Rich] - a position that has been uniformly accepted by historians since 1964.

HENRY ANSGAR KELLY is past Director of the Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, UCLA.
LOUIS W. KARLIN is an attorney with the California Court of Appeal and Fellow of the Center for Thomas More Studies, University of Dallas.
GERARD B. WEGEMER is Director of the Center for Thomas More Studies.

Contents

A Procedural Review of Thomas More's Trial - Henry Ansgar Kelly
Natural Law and the Trial of Thomas More - R.H. Helmholz
A Guide to Thomas More's Trial for Modern Lawyers - Louis W. Karlin and David R. Oakley
Thomas More's Three Prison Letters Reporting on His Interrogations - Elizabeth McCutcheon
Judicial Commentary on Thomas More's Trial: Preliminary Comment and Round Table - Sidney Fitzwater and Edith Hollan Jones and Jennie D. Latta and Michael Tugendhat
Documents
Thomas More's Trial: Docudrama

最近チェックした商品