Full Description
In response to recent media controversy and public debate about legal pluralism and multiculturalism, Manea argues against what she identifies as the growing tendency for people to be treated as 'homogenous groups' in Western academic discourse, rather than as individuals with authentic voices. Building on her knowledge of the situation for women in Middle Eastern and Islamic countries, she undertakes first-hand analysis of the Islamic shari'a councils and Muslim arbitration tribunals in various British cities. Based on meetings with the leading sheikhs - including the only woman on their panels - as well as interviews with experts on extremism, lawyers and activists in civil society and women's rights groups, Manea offers an impassioned critique of legal pluralism, connecting it with political Islam and detailing the lived experiences of women in Muslim communities.
Contents
Chapter 1. Introduction: The Debate
Chapter 2. A Critical Review of the Essentialist Paradigm
Chapter 3. Islamic Law in the West: The Case of Britain
Chapter 4. Legal Pluralism in Practice
Chapter 5. Islamic Law and Human Rights Between Theory
and Reality: Britain as a Showcase
Chapter 6. Islamism and Islamic Law in the West: Stating the Obvious? Britain as an Example
Chapter 7. Contextualising the Debate in Women's Reality: Shari'a Law Contested
Conclusion: Time for a Paradigm Shift
