Mind the Gap : Perspectives on Policy Evaluation and the Social Sciences (Comparative Policy Evaluation)

個数:

Mind the Gap : Perspectives on Policy Evaluation and the Social Sciences (Comparative Policy Evaluation)

  • 在庫がございません。海外の書籍取次会社を通じて出版社等からお取り寄せいたします。
    通常6~9週間ほどで発送の見込みですが、商品によってはさらに時間がかかることもございます。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合がございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 254 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9781412810753
  • DDC分類 320.6

Full Description

Over the past twenty to thirty years, evaluation has become increasingly important to the field of public policy. The number of people involved and specializing in evaluation has also increased markedly. Evidence of this trend can be found in the International Atlas of Evaluation, the establishment of new journals and evaluation societies, and the increase in systems of evaluation. Increasingly, the main reference point has become an assessment of the merit and value of interventions as such rather than the evaluator's disciplinary background. This growing importance of evaluation as an activity has also led to an increasing demand for the type of competencies evaluators should have.

Evaluation began as a niche area within the social and behavioral sciences. It subsequently became linked to policy research and analysis, and has, more recently, become trans-disciplinary. This volume demonstrates an association between the evaluation tradition in a particular country or policy field and the nature of the relationship between social and behavioral science research and evaluative practice. This book seeks to offer comprehensive data, which lead to conclusions about patterns that transcend the gap between evaluation and the social scientific disciplines.

Mind the Gap has a twofold aim. The first is to highlight and characterize the gap between evaluation practices and debates, and the substantive knowledge debates within the social and behavioral sciences. The second is to show why this gap is problematic for the practice of evaluation, while at the same time illustrating possible ways to build bridges. The book is centered on the value of producing useful evaluations grounded in social science theory and research.

Contents

Foreword -Ray C. Rist
Preface -Jos Vaessen and Frans L. Leeuw
Introduction: Mind the Gap -Frans L. Leeuw and Jos Vaessen
Part I: The Evolving Relationship between Evaluation and the Disciplines
1. US Sociology and Evaluation: Issues in the Relationship between Methodology and Theory -Nicoletta Stame
2. Evaluation and the Disciplines in Development -Robert Picciotto
3. Economics and Evaluation -Sandra Speer
Part II: Evaluation and Its Disciplinary Basis
4. The Intellectual Underpinnings of a Comprehensive Body of Evaluative Knowledge: The Case of INTEVAL -Lisa Birch and Steve Jacob
5. Public Management Theory, Evaluation, and Evidence-Based Policy -Robert Schwartz
Part III: Bridging the Gap between Evaluation and the Disciplines
6. Interventions as Theories: Closing the Gap between Evaluation and the Disciplines? -Jos Vaessen and Frans L. Leeuw
7. Middle Range Theory and Program Theory Evaluation: From Provenance to Practice -Ray Pawson
8. Realistic Evaluation and Disciplinary Knowledge: Applications from the Field of Criminology -Nick Tilley
Contributors
Index

最近チェックした商品