欲望、実践理性と善<br>Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good : Classical and Contemporary Perspectives

個数:

欲望、実践理性と善
Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good : Classical and Contemporary Perspectives

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 264 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780195382440
  • DDC分類 170

基本説明

The 'Guise of the Good' thesis - the view that desire, intention, or action always aims at the good - has received renewed attention in the last twenty years. The book brings together work on various issues related to this thesis both from contemporary and historical perspectives.

Full Description

Most philosophers working in moral psychology and practical reason think that either the notion of "good" or the notion of "desire" have central roles to play in our understanding of intentional explanations and practical reasoning. However, philosophers disagree sharply over how we are supposed to understand the notions of "desire" and "good", how these notions relate, and whether both play a significant and independent role in practical reason. In particular, the "Guise of the Good" thesis - the view that desire (or perhaps intention, or intentional action) always aims at the good - has received renewed attention in the last twenty years. Can one have desire for things that the desirer does not perceive to be good in any, or form intentions to act in way that one does not deem to be good? Does the notion of good play any essential role in an account of deliberation or practical reason? Moreover, philosophers also disagree about the relevant notion of good. Is it a purely formal notion, or does it involve a substantive conception of the good? Is the primary notion, the notion of the good for a particular agent, or the notion of good simpliciter? Does the relevant notion of good make essential appeal to human nature, or would it in principle extend to all rational beings? While these questions are central in contemporary work in ethics, practical reason, and philosophy of action, they are not new; similar issues were discussed in the ancient period. This volume of essays aims to bring together "systematic" and more historically-oriented work on these issues.

Contents

1. Sergio Tenenbaum (University of Toronto), Introduction ; 2. Matt Evans (New York University), A Partisan Guide to Socratic Intellectualism. ; 3. Rachel Barney (University of Toronto), Plato on the Desire for the Good. ; 4. Jessica Moss (University of Oxford), Aristotle's non-trivial, non-insane view that everyone always desires things under the guise of the good. ; 5. Kieran Setiya (University of Pittsburgh), Sympathy for the Devil. ; 6. Joseph Raz (University of Oxford), The Guise of the Good ; 7. Sebastian Rodl (University of Basel), The Form of the Will ; 8. Matthew Boyle and Doug Lavin (Harvard University), Goodness and Desire. ; 9. Sergio Tenenbaum (University of Toronto), Good and Good For. ; 10. Phil Clark (University of Toronto), Aspects, Guises, Species, and Knowing Something to be Good.

最近チェックした商品