ドブス事件で覆されたロウ対ウェイド判決:米国憲法と中絶の権利の過去・現在・未来<br>Roe v. Dobbs : The Past, Present, and Future of a Constitutional Right to Abortion

個数:1
紙書籍版価格
¥6,490
  • 電子書籍
  • ポイントキャンペーン

ドブス事件で覆されたロウ対ウェイド判決:米国憲法と中絶の権利の過去・現在・未来
Roe v. Dobbs : The Past, Present, and Future of a Constitutional Right to Abortion

  • 著者名:Bollinger, Lee C. (EDT)/Stone, Geoffrey (EDT)
  • 価格 ¥3,320 (本体¥3,019)
  • Oxford University Press(2024/02/13発売)
  • 冬の読書を楽しもう!Kinoppy 電子書籍・電子洋書 全点ポイント25倍キャンペーン(~1/25)
  • ポイント 750pt (実際に付与されるポイントはご注文内容確認画面でご確認下さい)
  • 言語:ENG
  • ISBN:9780197760369
  • eISBN:9780197760383

ファイル: /

Description

With this volume, Roe v. Dobbs: The Past, Present and Future of a Constitutional Right of Abortion, we confront the remarkable beginning and end--once again, after a half-century-of the landmark Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, shockingly overruled by the Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. The goal of this book is to bring together some of our nation's leading constitutional scholars, historians, philosophers, and medical experts to share their views on whether there should be a constitutional right to abortion and what the consequences of Dobbs might be.What makes this subject unique is how it intersects with our own lives, since both Bollinger and Stone were law clerks at the Supreme Court in the year that Roe was decided (1973)--Stone for Justice William Brennan and Bollinger for Chief Justice Warren Burger. During the Court's 1972 Term, when Roe was decided, the Court was in a state of flux. President Nixon had just appointed four Justices to the Court--Burger, Blackmun, Powell, and Rehnquist. The era of the Warren Court was clearly over. In those days, the Justices were non-partisan, often joined opinions across the political/ideological spectrum, and approached cases with an open mind. That in large part explains why the Court could reach the decision it did in Roe, with five of the six Republican-appointed Justices and two of the three Democratic-appointed Justices in the majority, and one Republican-appointed justice (Rehnquist) and one Democratic-appointed justice (White) in dissent. It was a different Court and a different era.

Table of Contents

AcknowledgmentsList of ContributorsDialogue Lee C. Bollinger and Geoffrey R. StonePart One The Supreme Court: Roe v. Dobbs1. Liberal Critics of Roe David A. Strauss2. Equality Emerges as a Ground for Abortion Rights in and After Dobbs Cary Franklin & Reva SiegelPart Two Close Readings of Roe3. Why Was Roe v. Wade Wrong? Jonathan Mitchell4. Justice Blackmun Got it Right in Roe v. Wade Erwin ChemerinskyPart Three The Path from Roe to Dobbs5. Abortion, Partisan Entrenchment, and the Republican Party Jack M. Balkin6. Some Realism About Precedent, In the Wake of Dobbs Michael W. McConnellPart Four Close Readings of Dobbs7. The Dobbs Gambit: Gaslighting at the Highest Level Khiara M. Bridges8. Dobbs and the Travails of Due Process Traditionalism Cass R. Sunstein9. Should Gradualism Have Prevailed in Dobbs? Richard M. Re10. Dobbs' Democratic Deficits Melissa Murray & Katherine ShawPart Five Historical Perspectives11. The Failure of Dobbs: The Entanglement of Abortion Bans, Criminalized Pregnancies, and Forced Family Separation Dorothy Roberts12. A Requiem For Roe: When Property Has No Privacy Michele Bratcher Goodwin13. Where History Fails Nancy F. Cott14. How Contraception and Abortion Got Divorced Linda Gordon15. The Antiabortion Movement and the Punishment Prerogative Mary ZieglerPart Six International Perspectives16. Abortion Policy Aimed at Promoting Life As Much As Possible Mark Tushnet17. American Exceptionalism and the Comparative Constitutional Law of Abortion Tom GinsburgPart Seven Implications for the Future18. Reproductive Technologies and Embryo Destruction After Dobbs Glenn Cohen19. Dobbs and Our Privacies Aziz Z. Huq & Rebecca Wexler20. The Unraveling: What Dobbs May Mean for Contraception, Liberty, and Constitutionalism Martha MinowClosing Dialogue Lee C. Bollinger and Geoffrey R. Stone

最近チェックした商品