Secret Subversion I : Mou Zongsan, Kant, and Early Confucianism

個数:1
紙書籍版価格
¥13,877
  • 電子書籍
  • ポイントキャンペーン

Secret Subversion I : Mou Zongsan, Kant, and Early Confucianism

  • 著者名:Wenming, Tang
  • 価格 ¥9,633 (本体¥8,758)
  • Routledge(2020/08/03発売)
  • 春分の日の三連休!Kinoppy 電子書籍・電子洋書 全点ポイント30倍キャンペーン(~3/22)
  • ポイント 2,610pt (実際に付与されるポイントはご注文内容確認画面でご確認下さい)
  • 言語:ENG
  • ISBN:9781032336008
  • eISBN:9781351242233

ファイル: /

Description

Mou Zongsan (1909–1995), one of the representatives of Modern Confucianism, belongs to the most important Chinese philosophers of the twentieth century. From a more traditional Confucian perspective, this book makes a critical analysis on Mou’s "moral metaphysics," mainly his thoughts about Confucian ethos.

The author observes that Mou simplifies Confucian ethos rooted in various and specific environments, making them equal to modern ethics, which is a subversion of the ethical order of life advocated by traditional Confucianism. The author believes, also, that Mou has twisted Confucian ethos systematically by introducing Kant’s concept of autonomy into the interpretation of Confucian thoughts.

Scholars and students in Chinese philosophy, especially those in Confucian studies, will be attracted by this book. Also, it will appeal to readers interested in comparative philosophy.

Table of Contents

Part 1 The Reduction of Morality 

Chapter I. Autonomy and Altruism: On the Moralistic Interpretation of Confucian Thought 

Chapter II. Do the Zhou People’s Concern-Consciousness and Respect for Virtue Constitute a Moral Breakthrough? 

Chapter III. Is the Confucian Doctrine of Benevolence a Moralistic Doctrine? 

Chapter IV. Is Mencius’ Theory of Goodness of Human Nature a Moral Metaphysics? 

Part 2 The Appropriation of Autonomy 

Chapter I. The Spirit of Confucian Ethics and Autonomous Morality 

Chapter II. Mencius on the Internality of Benevolence and Righteousness 

Chapter III. "The Internality of Benevolence and Righteousness" and Autonomous Morality 

Chapter IV. Confucian Ethics: Virtue-Based or Law-Based?