The Art of Arguing in the World of Renaissance Humanism (Supplementa Humanistica Lovaniensia)

個数:
  • ポイントキャンペーン

The Art of Arguing in the World of Renaissance Humanism (Supplementa Humanistica Lovaniensia)

  • ウェブストア価格 ¥15,417(本体¥14,016)
  • Leuven University Press(2013/12発売)
  • 外貨定価 US$ 75.00
  • 【ウェブストア限定】サマー!ポイント5倍キャンペーン 対象商品(~7/21)※店舗受取は対象外
  • ポイント 700pt
  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Paperback:紙装版/ペーパーバック版/ページ数 240 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9789058679635
  • DDC分類 820.9

Full Description

Strategies and characteristics of scournful criticism and fierce debate in the Humanist tradition
Renaissance humanists were often engaged in a wide variety of polemics, ranging from matter-of-fact debate to scathing invective. The programmatic nature of Renaissance humanism, intent on a fundamental reform of language, education, and society at large, led the humanists almost inevitably to conflicts with those who represented other intellectual traditions, first and foremost the Scholastics. In addition, internal competition among humanists sparked violent quarrels, in which opponents walked a thin line between defensive self-preservation and aggressive self-promotion. In the 16th century, the practice of dispute was partly reshaped by new national and confessional divides; the intensification of controversy also prompted a more conscious reflection on the potential and limits of polemical exchange. This volume sheds light on the characteristics and strategies of the humanist art of arguing through a series of case studies from representative areas. The contributors intend to show how humanists constantly remodelled the art of arguing by exploiting in ever new ways the Classical rhetoric of blame and thus paved the way for the early modern culture of dispute.

Contributors
Arnold Becker (University of Bonn), Christine Bénévent (Centre d'Etudes Supérieures de la Renaissance / University of Tours), Olga Anna Duhl (Lafayette College, Easton, PA), Chris L. Heesakkers (Universities of Amsterdam and Leiden), Marc Laureys (University of Bonn), Joanna Partyka (University of Warsaw / Polish Academy of Sciences), Roswitha Simons (University of Göttingen), George Hugo Tucker (University of Reading)

Contents

Acknowledgements
Marc Laureys / Roswitha Simons / Arnold Becker, Towards a Theory of the Humanistic Art of Arguing
Roswitha Simons, Waffen der Nemesis, Pfeile der Satire. Gewaltmetaphorik im metapoetischen Diskurs neulateinischer Satiriker
Olga Anna Duhl, Poetic Theory and Sense Perception in Jodocus Badius Ascensius's Stultiferae naues (c. 1501): from Subitus Calor to Vituperatio
Arnold Becker, Huttens Arminius: Humanistische Streitkultur zwischen literarischer Unverlässlichkeit und nationaler Identitätsstiftung
Christine Bénévent, Des Barbares aux Cicéroniens Ou comment accommoder l'art de la dispute selon Érasme
Chris L. Heesakkers, Multa fortuito fieri. Alberto Pio's postmortem Praefatio in his Controversy with Erasmus, an Ill-fated Advance
George Hugo Tucker, Strategies of Argument, Politics and Poetics in the Centones ex Virgilio (1555-1556) of Lelio Capilupi of Mantua
Marc Laureys, Die Kunst der Verunglimpfung in Nikodemus Frischlins Satiren gegen Jakob Rabus
Joanna Partyka, The Classical Tradition as a Weapon against the obtrectatores Poloniae
Contributors Index nominum

最近チェックした商品