Debating the Law, Creating Gender : Sharia and Lawmaking in Palestine, 2012-2018 (Women and Gender: the Middle East and the Islamic World)

個数:

Debating the Law, Creating Gender : Sharia and Lawmaking in Palestine, 2012-2018 (Women and Gender: the Middle East and the Islamic World)

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • ≪洋書のご注文について≫ 「海外取次在庫あり」「国内在庫僅少」および「国内仕入れ先からお取り寄せいたします」表示の商品でもクリスマス前(12/20~12/25)および年末年始までにお届けできないことがございます。あらかじめご了承ください。

  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 404 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9789004442306
  • DDC分類 346.569420166

Full Description

In Palestine, family law is a controversial topic publicly debated by representatives of the state, Sharia establishment, and civil society. Yet to date no such law exists. This book endeavors to determine why by focusing on the conceptualization of gender and analyzing "law in the making" and the shifts in debates (2012-2018). In 2012, a ruling on khulʿ-divorce was issued by the Sharia Court and was well received by civil society, but when the debate shifted in 2018 to how to "harmonize" international law with Islamic standards, the process came to a standstill. These developments and the various power relations cannot be properly understood without taking into consideration the terminology used and redefined in these debates.

Contents

Preface

List of Ilustrations

Abbreviations

1 Introduction

 1.1 Research Design

 1.2 Research Literature

2 Palestinian Legal System

 2.1 Basic Law, Sharia Court High Council, and Supreme Constitutional Court

 2.2 The Jordanian Law of Personal Status (JLPS) of 1976, Applicable in the West Bank and the Egyptian Family Rights Law (EFRL) of 1954, Applicable in Gaza

3 The Actors

 3.1 State

 3.2 Civil Society

 3.3 Sharia Establishment

4 Khulʿ: The New Ruling of 2012 and Its Context

 4.1 Uses of the Past: Sources of Khulʿ and the Case of Egypt

 4.2 Legal Regulation in Palestine

 4.3 Analysis of Taʿmīm 59/2012

 4.4 The Qāḍī al-Quḍāt as a Quasi-Legislator?

5 Khulʿ in University Teaching

 5.1 Birzeit University as Part of the Palestinian Public Sphere

 5.2 Approaches to Academic Teaching

 5.3 Class on Khulʿ on October 31, 2013

 5.4 Textbook of the Supreme Judge's Class: Past or Present?

6 Khulʿ in Iterations

 6.1 Civil Society

 6.2 The State: Palestinian Authority

 6.3 Sharia Establishment

 6.4 Conclusion

7 CEDAW and Palestine

 7.1 CEDAW State Report of Palestine, March 10, 2017

 7.2 List of Issues and Questions Relating to the Report by the State of Palestine to the CEDAW Committee, November 30, 2017, and Replies to Questions (List of Issues), February 19, 2018

 7.3 Shadow Reports by Civil Society Organizations

 7.4 The Palestinian Delegation in Geneva, July 2018

8 CEDAW in Iterations

 8.1 Palestine Discusses: How Can International Law and Sharia Be Harmonized?

 8.2 Developments through the End of 2018

9 Khulʿ and International Law in Gaza

 9.1 The Legal Background of Gaza

 9.2 A Failed Draft Law in 2013 and the Issuing of Two Taʿmīmāt in 2016

 9.3 Comparison between the West Bank and Gaza

 9.4 Standing Up for a New Khulʿ Law in Gaza: The Civil Society Debate in Gaza 2012 to 2017

 9.5 Conclusion

10 Conclusions

References

 Websites

 Laws

Terminology

Index

最近チェックした商品