- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > 英文書
- > Philosophy
Full Description
Are C. S. Lewis's major arguments in defense of Christian belief sound? In C. S. Lewis's Christian Apologetics: Pro and Con, defenders and critics of Lewis's apologetics square off and debate the merits of Lewis's arguments from desire, from reason, from morality, the "trilemma" argument for the divinity of Christ, as well as Lewis's response to the problem of evil. By means of these lively, in-depth debates, readers will emerge with a deeper understanding and appreciation of today's most influential Christian apologist.
Contents
EDITORIAL FOREWORD
KENNETH A. BRYSON
PREFACE
INTRODUCTION: OXFORD'S BONNY APOLOGIST
GREGORY BASSHAM
Part One:
THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIRE
ONE Pro: A Defense of C. S. Lewis's Argument from Desire
PETER S. WILLIAMS
TWO Con: Quenching the Argument from Desire
GREGORY BASSHAM
THREE Reply to Gregory Bassham
PETER S. WILLIAMS
FOUR Reply to Peter Williams
GREGORY BASSHAM
Part Two:
THE ARGUMENT FROM REASON
FIVE Pro: The Argument from Reason Defended
VICTOR REPPERT
SIX Con: Naturalism Undefeated
DAVID KYLE JOHNSON
SEVEN Reply to David Kyle Johnson
VICTOR REPPERT
EIGHT Reply to Victor Reppert
DAVID KYLE JOHNSON
Part Three:
THE MORAL ARGUMENT
NINE Pro: The Moral Argument is Convincing
DAVID BAGGETT
TEN Con: A Critique of the Moral Argument
ERIK J. WIELENBERG
ELEVEN: Reply to Erik Wielenberg
DAVID BAGGETT
TWELVE Reply to David Baggett
ERIK J. WIELENBERG
Part Four:
THE TRILEMMA ARGUMENT
THIRTEEN Pro: A Defense of C. S. Lewis's "Trilemma"
DONALD S. WILLIAMS
FOURTEEN Con: Lewis's Trilemma: Case Not Proven
ADAM BARKMAN
FIFTEEN Reply to Adam Barkman
DONALD S. WILLIAMS
SIXTEEN Reply to Donald Williams
ADAM BARKMAN
Part Five:
THE PROBLEM OF EVIL
SEVENTEEN Pro: The Problem of Pain Defended
PHILIP TALLON
EIGHTEEN Con: C. S. Lewis on Evil: At Best a Likely Story
DAVID L. O'HARA
NINETEEN Reply to David L. O'Hara
PHILIP TALLON
TWENTY Reply to Philip Tallon
DAVID L. O'HARA
WORKS CITED
THE CONTRIBUTORS
INDEX
