When Patient and Doctor Disagree : Autonomous Patient versus Paternalistic Doctor (2016. 144 p. 21,5 cm)

個数:

When Patient and Doctor Disagree : Autonomous Patient versus Paternalistic Doctor (2016. 144 p. 21,5 cm)

  • 在庫がございません。海外の書籍取次会社を通じて出版社等からお取り寄せいたします。
    通常6~9週間ほどで発送の見込みですが、商品によってはさらに時間がかかることもございます。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合がございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Paperback:紙装版/ペーパーバック版
  • 商品コード 9783943324600

Description


(Short description)
For a long time, the basic rule for the professional relationship between patient and doctor has been that the patient doesnot question the doctor's knowledge and instructions. However, patients now have more medical information. The consequence is a strengthening of the autonomy of patients, which inevitably leads to some disagreements between patients and doctors. This book is a plea for the autonomy of the patient from a philosophical and psychological point of view. In particular, it deals with psychiatry in psychiatry
(Text)
Since the beginning of Western Medicine nearly 2500 years ago with Hippocrates, the essential ground rule for the professional relationship between patient and doctor has remained the same, namely the patient relies on the knowledge and integrity of the doctor. There has been a striking disparity of power in this relationship, very much in favour of the doctor. In recent years much has changed. Not only have there been huge advances in medical knowledge, but patients have themselves become more knowledgeable, mainly due to the internet and the establishment of voluntary bodies which disseminate information about the diagnosis and treatment of illnesses.As a consequence, the so-called paternalistic medical approach is slowly giving way to patient-centered medicine in which the autonomy of patients becomes increasingly important. This has inevitably led to some differences of opinion between patients and doctors.This book advances philosophical arguments in favour of patient autonomy and describes some of these differences of opinion as they arise in psychiatric practice. It includes chapters on various restrictions, especially compulsory detention, imposed on patients under the Mental Health Act, epistemic injustice, do-not-resuscitate orders and assisted suicide, in which the issues are discussed from both a philosophical and psychological perspective. The book will be of interest to all professionals and non-professionals who are interested in ethical dilemmas which often arise in psychiatry.
(Author portrait)
Paul Crichton is a Consultant Psychiatrist who now works for the Ministry of Justice in London. He has a PhD in philosophy, and is interested in using philosophy to throw light on medicine and psychiatry. He is the author of Self-Realization - Thinking about How to Live.Steven Greer is the founder of psycho-oncology in the UK. He has published more than 100 peer-reviewed papers in this area, developed, with Stirling Moorey, a form of psychotherapy for people with cancer using cognitive behavioural techniques, and carried out studies to demonstrate the efficacy of this treatment.

最近チェックした商品