The Politics of the Anti-Terror Legislation : The Stance of The Predominant West against Terrorism (2010. 104 S. 220 mm)

個数:

The Politics of the Anti-Terror Legislation : The Stance of The Predominant West against Terrorism (2010. 104 S. 220 mm)

  • オンデマンド(OD/POD)版です。キャンセルは承れません。
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Paperback:紙装版/ペーパーバック版
  • 商品コード 9783843364157

Description


(Text)
This book is about the stance the predominant West has taken against terrorism and the legislation passed in order to combat this threat. It also exposes the flawed politics behind the passing of such legislation with a strong focus on America and the United Kingdom. This book is divided in three sections; 'The Historical Era', 'The Contemporary Era' and 'The Future Era' all of which attempt to deduce whether or not the U.S. can be classed as a terrorist state, using its very own definitions as to what a terrorist is and what would be classed as terrorism. The main research into this area of discussion has come from two leading commentators from the opposite sides of the spectrum. Philip Bobbitt argues on behalf of America and her actions as found in his book; 'Terror and Consent: The Wars for the Twenty-first Century' whereas Noam Chomsky argues against America and her actions as found in his book; '9-11'. Never have these two leading authors, and political figures ever been opposed against one another in this manner, creating an interesting chemistry between the two.
(Author portrait)
LLB in Law at the University of Kent, UK.

最近チェックした商品