- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > ドイツ書
- > Social Sciences, Jurisprudence & Economy
- > Politics, Society, Work
- > political science
Description
(Text)
The violent eruption of the Libya crisis and the seemingly uncoordinated reaction of the international community highlighted once more that efficient crisis management needs to grasp a situation in all its complexity, before being able to act appropriately: The legitimacy of any intervention is crucial for its success, and therefore an international mandate, a coherent approach and a sensible combination of civilian and military means are indispensable. The European External Action Service was envisioned as the main tool to enable the EU to act in accordance with these international diplomatic requirements in a more unified and coherent manner. Cathleen Berger analyses its capacity to act to do so. She explores both intergovernmental and supranational elements and identifies the players involved as well as crucial points and critical developments, leading to a substantiated evaluation of the EEAS as an important corporate actor and the respective implications for the development of crisis management in times of conflict and crisis.
(Text)
(Table of content)
Service and its Capacity to Act: The Actor
4.1. Development of the Service
4.2. Legal Basis
4.3. Position in the EU Structure
4.4. Design as a Functionally Autonomous Body
4.5. Tasks and Resources within EU Crisis Management
4.6. Interim Conclusion: A Theoretically Capable Actor
4.7. The EEAS in Relation to other Actors: Interactions and Games
4.7.1. Supranational Players: European Commission and Parliament
4.7.2. Intergovernmental Players: Member States and Council of Ministers
4.7.3. Formal Players: European Council and its President
4.7.4. Sidelined Players: Rotating Presidency and European Court of Justice
4.7.5. Interim Conclusion: Cooperation as the Key to Success
5. In lieu of a Conclusion: The Case of Libya Coherent and Capable?
5.1. The Libya Crisis: Situation and Development in a Nutshell
5.2. The EU s Reaction
5.3. The Games played: Explaining EU Action
5.4. Results: Moving Forward while Creating New Puzzles
Literature
Annex
