- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > ドイツ書
- > Humanities, Arts & Music
- > Religion & Theology
- > christianity
Description
Crucial methodological differences between "Antiochene" and "Alexandrian" approach to biblical exegesis are occasionally facing wholesale denial in current research. The present publication offers a differentiated response to this based on a case study on "Genesis". A typically "Antiochene" conception of 'salvation historism' The volume assembles nine contributions illustrating the specifically "Antiochene" approach to interpreting the book of Genesis, the peculiarity of which has occasionally faced wholesale denial in current research.After a general introduction on the Antiochene method in general and the possibilty of reconstructing its most important lost contributions from secondary sources, there are four general case studies on peculiar exegetical problems, two on the "Spirit of God" in Gen 1,2, and two others on the role of Adam and the image of God, all of them taking into account a broader "Antiochene" context including possible Jewish influence.The four remaining contributions focus on Theodore of Mopsuestia and his Genesis-commentary, two of them in a dogmatical, one of them in a methodological and the final one in a philological perspective.All in all, these contributions illustrate the typically "Antiochene" conception of 'salvation historism' which - from a Christian perspective - accounts for the historical limitations and ambiguities in the Old Testament by recurring to a pedagogical conception of divine revelation activity which has the Old Testament-Creator disclosing himself only gradually as identical with the New Testament-Saviour. Benjamin Gleede ist Projektleiter an der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Agnethe Siquans is Professor for Old Testament Studies at the Faculty of Catholic Theology at the University of Vienna. Agnethe Siquans studied catholic theology, religious education and Jewish studies. Her doctoral thesis was an analysis of the Quaestiones in Deuteronomium by Theodoret of Cyrus. Her habilitation thesis dealt with "Female prophets of the Old Testament in patristic reception". Her main research fields are intertextual exegesis of the Old Testament, feminist and gender studies of the Bible and early Christian texts, the reception of the Bible in patristic writings, church fathers and rabbinic midrash and Jewish-Christians relations in Antiquity. 2016-2019 she led a project on "Exodus 1-2 in patristic and rabbinic interpretation", funded by the Austrian Science Fund. She works on commentaries on Psalms 101-119 and on the Book of Daniel and is co-editor of the series "Ancient Scriptural Interpretation" and "Vetus Testamentum Patristicum". Thomas R. Karmann war Professor für Kirchengeschichte und Patrologie am Lehrstuhl für Kirchengeschichte des Altertums, christliche Archäologie und Patrologie der Universität Würzburg. Hans-Ulrich Weidemann ist Professor für Neues Testament am Seminar für Katholische Theologie der Universität Siegen. Susanne Plietzsch ist Leiterin des Zentrums für Jüdische Kulturgeschichte an der Universität Salzburg.
-
- 洋書電子書籍
-
ゲーム理論のネットワーク応用
G…
-
- 洋書電子書籍
- Granular Computing …



