Historical Injustice in Rawlsian Theory : DE (Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations)

個数:
  • 予約

Historical Injustice in Rawlsian Theory : DE (Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations)

  • 現在予約受付中です。出版後の入荷・発送となります。
    重要:表示されている発売日は予定となり、発売が延期、中止、生産限定品で商品確保ができないなどの理由により、ご注文をお取消しさせていただく場合がございます。予めご了承ください。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版
  • 商品コード 9783032255846

Description

This book argues that contemporary liberal societies are rife with civic divisions related to the past, and that coming to terms with this past is a phenomenon of utmost importance for citizens and liberal societies. It has been assumed that, however widespread and deep this phenomenon, this history or past is outside the bounds of the most prominent theory of liberal justice, i.e. Rawls s theory. This book argues that this is a mistake, that the scope of justice needs to encompass historical rectification, and that Rawls s theory must show concern for historical injustice.

This book examines the empirical and normative evidence granting the significance of historical rectification. It argues that coming to terms with a past shaped by political violence bears extremely high importance to liberal societies. This book is of interest to contemporary political philosophers, political theorists, and those interested in the role of principles of justice for politics and public political culture. It draws on fundamental Rawlsian insights and concepts to rigorously theorise some of the most important and recurrent challenges in addressing past wrongdoing. 

1. Introduction.- 2. Historical Rectification: Self-Respect, Mutual Respect, and Stability.- 3. Critical Historical Narratives: Liberal Integrity, the Second Moral Power, and Reasonableness.- 4. Is historical rectification outside of the scope of rawls s theory?.- 5. Towards a Principle of Historical Rectification For Ideal Theory.- 6. Confronting the Past In An Ideal Society Of Peoples.- 7. Some Remarks on Non-Ideal Theory Implementation.

Juan Espindola (PhD, University of Michigan) is a researcher at the Institute for Philosophical Research at the National Autonomous University of Mexico. His research focuses on transitional justice, espionage, and artificial intelligence. He is the author of Atrocity without Punishment: A Political Theory of Leniency in Mexico's "War on Drugs" (Stanford University Press, 2026), Transitional Justice after German Reunification: Exposing Unofficial Collaborators (Cambridge University Press, 2015), and co-editor of Understanding Collaboration in Authoritarian and Armed Conflict Settings (Oxford University Press, 2022). His work has appeared in journals such as Ethics and International Affairs, Theoretical Criminology, Journal of Social Philosophy, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Res Publica, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Studies in Philosophy and Education, and others.

Moisés Vaca (PhD in Philosophy, University College London) is a researcher at the Institute for Philosophical Research at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). His work focuses on liberal egalitarianism and Rawlsian theory, including issues related to victims of historical injustice, minority cultures, women, the LGBT+ community, solidarity, public reason, and polarization. His work has been published in journals such as Bioethics, Crítica, Dianoia, Ethics and Global Politics, Hypatia, Latin American Journal of Political Philosophy, Res Publica, and others.


最近チェックした商品