How Philosophers Argue : An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell--Copleston Debate (Argumentation Library)

個数：

How Philosophers Argue : An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell--Copleston Debate (Argumentation Library)

Leal, Fernando/ Marraud, Hubert

ウェブストア価格 ¥22,764（本体¥20,695）
Springer Nature Switzerland AG（2023/02発売）
外貨定価 US$ 109.99
ポイント 206pt

提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
【重要ご説明事項】
1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて

【入荷遅延について】
世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。

◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。

◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。

製本 Paperback:紙装版/ペーパーバック版／ページ数 472 p.
商品コード 9783030853709

Full Description

This volume presents a double argumentative analysis of the debate between Bertrand Russell and Frederick Copleston on the existence of God. It includes an introduction justifying the choice of text and describing the historical and philosophical background of the debate. It also provides a transcript of the debate, based in part on the original recording.

The argumentative analyses occupy Parts I and II of the book. In Part I the argumentative process is analysed by means of the ideal model of critical discussion, the workhorse of pragma-dialectics. Part I shows how the two parties go through the four stages of a critical discussion. It highlights the questions raised over and beyond the presiding question of whether God exists and examines almost a hundred questions that are raised. Many are left in the air, whereas a few others give rise to sundry sub-discussions or meta-dialogues. In Part II the theoretical framework of argument dialectic is put to work: argument structures are identified by means of punctuation marks, argumentative connectors and operators, allowing to see the argumentative exchange as the collaborative construction of a macro-argument. Such a macro-argument is both a joint product of the arguers and a complex structure representing the dialectical relationships between the individual arguments combined in it. Finally, the complementarity of the two approaches is addressed. Thus the book can be described as an exercise in adversarial collaboration.

Preface.- Introduction.- Chapter 1. Argumentation Theories.- Part I: A P-Theoretical Analysis of the Debate, by Fernando Leal.- Chapter 2. Description of the Method Followed.- Chapter 3. Analysis of Segment I: Start of the Debate.- Chapter 4. Analysis of Segment II: Discussion of Copleston's Metaphysical Argument.- Chapter 5. Analysis of Segment III: Discussion of Copleston's Religious Argument.- Chapter 6. Analysis of Segment IV: Discussion of Copleston's Moral Argument.- Chapter 7. Analysis of Segment V: Summing-Up of the Arguments.- Part II: An E-Theoretical Analysis of the Debate, by Hubert Marraud.- Chapter 8. Argument Dialectic.- Chapter 9. Argumentation Structures and Operations.- Chapter 10. Counterarguments.- Chapter 11. Co-oriented Reasons and Modifiers.- Chapter 12. Intertwined Structures.- Chapter 13. An Argument-Dialectical Analysis of the Russell-Copleston Debate.- Chapter 14. An Exercise in Adversarial Collaboration.- Appendix: Text of the Russell-Copleston Debate.