Public Preferences and Institutional Designs : Israel and Turkey Compared (2022)

個数:

Public Preferences and Institutional Designs : Israel and Turkey Compared (2022)

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Paperback:紙装版/ペーパーバック版/ページ数 272 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9783030845568
  • DDC分類 351.5694

Full Description

This book explores the existence of gaps between public preferences and institutional designs in democracies, and specifically cases in which such gaps are maintained for a long period of time without being challenged by the electorate. Gaps such as these can be seen in the complex relations between the state and religion in Israel and Turkey, and more specifically in their policies on marriage. This line of investigation is interesting both theoretically and empirically, as despite their poles apart policies, Israel and Turkey share a similar pattern of institutional dynamics. Existing explanations for this phenomenon suggested either civil society-based arguments or intra-institutional dynamics, as reasons for the maintenance of such gaps. This book enriches our understanding of policy dynamics in democratic systems by introducing a third line of argument, one that emphasizes the effective role state institutions play in maintaining such arrangements for long periods, often against the public will.      

Contents

1. Enduring Gaps between Public Preferences and Institutional Designs.- 2. Conceptualizing Enduring Gaps between Public Preferences and Institutional Designs.- 3. Researching Enduring Gaps in Comparative Research: The Data, the Methods, and the Cases.- 4. The Israeli Case: Israel's Formation of Religious State Institutions.- 5. The Israeli Case: The Lack of Societal Pressure to Modify the Religious Marriage Policy.- 6. The Israeli Case: The Use of Institutional Pressure Relief Valves.- 7. The Turkish Case—Turkey's Formation of Secular State Institutions.- 8. The Turkish Case: The Lack of Societal Pressure to Modify Secular Marriage Policy.- 9. The Turkish Case—The Use of Institutional Pressure Relief Valves.- 10. Conclusion.

最近チェックした商品