- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > ドイツ書
- > Humanities, Arts & Music
- > Philosophy
- > general surveys & lexicons
Full Description
This volume comprises a selection of contributions to the theorizing about argumentation that have been presented at the 9th conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA), held in Amsterdam in July 2018.
The chapters included provide a general theoretical perspective on central topics in argumentation theory, such as argument schemes and the fallacies. Some contributions concentrate on the treatment of the concept of conductive argument. Other contributions are dedicated to specific issues such as the justification of questions, the occurrence of mining relations, the role of exclamatives, argumentative abduction, eudaimonistic argumentation and a typology of logical ways to counter an argument. In a number of cases the theoretical problems addressed are related to a specific type of context, such as the burden of proof in philosophical argumentation, the charge of committing a genetic fallacy in strategic manoeuvring in philosophy,the necessity of community argument, and connection adequacy for arguments with institutional warrants.
The volume offers a great deal of diversity in its breadth of coverage of argumentation theory and wide geographic representation from North and South America to Europe and China.
Contents
Chapter 1. Introduction; Frans H. van Eemeren & Bart Garssen.- Chapter 2. Scheme Theory; Hans Vilhelm Hansen.- Chapter 3. Extending the Pragma-dialectical Approach to Argument Schemes; Frans H. van Eemeren & Bart Garssen.- Chapter 4. Give the Standard Treatment of Fallacies a Chance: A Rhetorical-pragmatic Proposal; Steve Oswald & Thierry Herman.- Chapter 5. Interrogative Burden of Proof in Philosophical Argumentation; Joaquin Galindo Castañeda.- Chapter 6. On the Necessity of Community Argument, Along with Inherent and Emerging Obstacles to it; Dale Hample.- Chapter 7. Argument Evaluation and Fallacies in Philosophical Dialogues: A Pragma-dialectical Approach; Federico E. López.- Chapter 8. Eudaimonistic Argumentation; Andrew Aberdein.- Chapter 9. Exclamatives in Argumentation; Ronny Boogaart.- Chapter 10. Assessing Connection Adequacy for Arguments with Institutional Warrants; James B. Freeman.- Chapter 11. On the Logical Ways to Counter an Argument: A Typology and Some Theoretical Consequences; Hubert Marraud.- Chapter 12. Arguing for Questions; David Hitchcock.- Chapter 13. The Mystery of the Interpretation: Less than a Second for Doing an "Argumentative" Abduction; Antonio Duarte.- Chapter 14. Is "Conductive Argument" a Single Argument?; Isabela Fairclough.- Chapter 15. On the Logical Reconstruction of Conductive Argument; Xie Yun.- Chapter 16. Are Conductive Arguments a Distinct type of Argument?; Liao Yanlin.- Chapter 17. Deploying Machine Learning Classifiers For Argumentative Relations "In The Wild"; Oana Cocarascu & Francesca Toni.
