Case Studies in Dysphagia Malpractice Litigation

個数:

Case Studies in Dysphagia Malpractice Litigation

  • 在庫がございません。海外の書籍取次会社を通じて出版社等からお取り寄せいたします。
    通常6~9週間ほどで発送の見込みですが、商品によってはさらに時間がかかることもございます。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合がございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Paperback:紙装版/ペーパーバック版/ページ数 109 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9781597563253
  • DDC分類 344.730411

Full Description

Drawing on his experiences as an Expert Witness in numerous medico-legal cases, Dennis Tanner provides an overview of dysphagia and reviews issues that may lead to malpractice litigation. The first part of the book he provides a general overview of the anatomy, physiology, and neurology of sucking, chewing, and swallowing. The three stages of swallowing are detailed including objectives, methods, and procedures of evaluation and treatment. In the second part, he addresses the primary issues in dysphagia malpractice litigation including professional proficiency in dysphagia management, professional communication, the clinical bedside assessment and instrumental swallowing studies, and diet and feeding considerations. Part III comprises a review of dysphagia malpractice litigation issues and the role of the expert witness, and the concluding part provides a comprehensive analysis of five dysphagia malpractice cases and reviews the issues from the plaintiff and defense positions. All five dysphagia cases involve the deaths of the dysphagic patients. FROM THE AUTHOR I have been involved in many legal cases during my thirty-year career in communication sciences and disorders.Although I have served, in some capacity, as an expert witness in cases involving voice disorders, stuttering, birth defects, and other communication disorders, the majority of the litigation concerned dysphagia.
With few exceptions, the dysphagia cases involved the deaths of the patients allegedly from choking or aspiration pneumonia. In most of these dysphagia malpractice cases, the plaintiff retained me. These cases involved a lengthy period of forensic investigation, sometimes taking years, and most were settled before going to trial. In all dysphagia cases that were settled out-of-court, I was not apprised of the specific settlement terms. However, the decisions often involved large awards to the plaintiffs from insurance companies representing medical facilities and health care professionals. In every case, my resume and other credentials were made available to all parties involved in the litigation. My credibility in serving as an expert witness comes from my academic credentials, teaching experience and awards, and scholarship in the profession of communication sciences and disorders.Perhaps the most valuable contribution to my credibility as an expert witness is my extensive clinical experience supervising employees and consultants in dysphagia malpractice management or in my direct clinical provision of dysphagia services.This was done through my company, Tanner Rehabilitation Services, Inc.
, over a twenty-five-year period in which I was involved in the management of hundreds of dysphagia patients at several medical facilities. What you will read in this volume is an overview of swallowing and dysphagia technical information that I consider important and were relevant to many cases of dysphagia malpractice litigation in which I was involved. While there are many books on swallowing and its disorders, and approaches to managing dysphagia, what is provided herein is based on a litigation perspective. While each legal case involving dysphagia management is unique, several issues usually surfaced as pivotal ones and are also discussed. There are also five case studies with analysis of their implications for dysphagia management practices.They are included for illustration purposes and to show the processes and outcomes of actual dysphagia malpractice litigation cases. I understand and appreciate that dysphagia malpractice litigation is a controversial and hotly-contested topic.Some clinicians believe it is an unnecessary intrusion into a health care professional's provision of services by lawyers and the judicial system.Others believe that dysphagia malpractice litigation prevents unnecessary negative outcomes, results in a higher quality of service for all dysphagia patients, and provides just compensation and damages for dysphagia patients and their families who were victims of improper medical management of the disorder.
I personally believe the latter while I respect the views of people holding the former opinion. However, the legal system provides for resolution of malpractice litigation based on the rule of law and the opinions of expert witnesses.

Contents

Foreword by Christopher Regan, Esq. To the Reader Acknowledgements Introduction Part I: Overview of Swallowing and Dysphagia Defining Dysphagia Primary Nerves and Muscles of Deglutition The Dysphagia Evaluation General Background Information Oral Stage Clinical Bedside Assessment Pharyngeal Stage Clinical Bedside Assessment Laryngeal-Esophageal Clinical Bedside Assessment Instrumental Dysphagia Assessment Treating Dysphagia Tracheotomies Feeding Tubes Pediatric Dysphagia Thought, Discussion, and Study Questions Part II: Issues in Dysphagia Malpractice Litigation Primary Dysphagia Malpractice Litigation Issues Professional Proficiency in Dysphagia Management Professional Communication Accuracy, Appropriateness, and Timeliness of Clinical Bedside Screening and Assessment Instrumental Swallowing Studies Fiberoptic Endoscopic Examination Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study Diet, NPO Status, and Tube Feeding Thought, Discussion, and Study Questions Part III: Dysphagia Malpractice Litigation and the Expert Witness Opinions, Impeachment, and Probabilities The Investigative Process The Clinical Timeline Thought, Discussion, and Study Questions Part IV: Dysphagia Malpractice Case Studies Case Study 1: Albert Anderson Opinion Case Study 2: Christine Fuller Opinion Case Study 3: Roy Johnson Opinion Case Study 4: Catherine Townsend Opinion Case Study 5: Joan Munger Opinion Case Analyses and Recommendations Summary Thought, Discussion, and Study Questions References Suggested Reading Abbreviations and Glossary Index

最近チェックした商品