- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > 英文書
- > Politics / International Relations
基本説明
Drawing on the cases of Malawi, Zambia, and Namibia, it explains the varying levels of judicial autonomy in emerging democracies.
Full Description
That judicial institutions are important for emerging democracies leaves little (if any) room for debate. But to what extent do judiciaries in these new democracies maintain their autonomy? And what accounts for varying levels of autonomy across states? Drawing on the cases of Malawi, Zambia, and Namibia - and offering a novel analytical framework - Peter VonDoepp illuminates why power holders behave as they do toward the courts. VonDoepp considers whether and why political leaders have respected or undermined judicial autonomy in each of the three cases. He also addresses how the courts themselves have shaped executive-judicial relations. His findings present unexpected challenges for existing frameworks, as well as important lessons about the factors and conditions affecting judicial development in transitional states. The book explains the varying levels of judicial autonomy in emerging democracies, focusing on why political power holders behave as they do toward the courts.
Contents
Democracy and Judicial Autonomy: Investigating the Southern African Cases. Understanding Government Choices. Judicial Politics in Theoretical Perspective. Neopatrimonial Politics and the Intimidation of the Courts in Zambia. Patronage, Threats, and the Problem of Judicial Control in Malawi. Party Dominance and Judicial Autonomy in Namibia. Insights from the Southern African Cases.
