- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > 英文書
- > Politics / International Relations
Full Description
What moral standards ought nation-states abide by when selecting immigration policies? Peter Higgins argues that immigration policies can only be judged by considering the inequalities that are produced by the institutions - such as gender, race and class - that constitute our social world. He challenges conventional positions on immigration justice, including the view that states have a right to choose whatever immigration policies they like, or that all immigration restrictions ought to be eliminated and borders opened. Rather than suggesting one absolute solution, Higgins argues that a unique set of immigration policies will be just for each country. He concludes with concrete recommendations for policymaking.
Contents
The Philosophical and Empirical Context
Nationalist Approaches to Immigration Justice
Cosmopolitan Approaches to Immigration Justice
The Priority of Disadvantage Principle
Immigration Justice: In Defense of the Priority of Disadvantage Principle
Admission, Exclusion, and Beyond: Which Immigration Policies Are Just?
Bibliography
Notes
