- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > 英文書
- > Religion / Ethics
Full Description
Contemporaries as Cambridge undergraduates in the late 1840s, Joseph Barber Lightfoot (1828-89), Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-92), and John Eyton Bickersteth Mayor (1825-1910) all went on to distinguished careers. Mayor, a classical scholar, became President of St John's, while Lightfoot and Hort - members, along with Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901) of the 'Cambridge triumvirate' - were eventually appointed respectively Bishop of Durham and Lady Margaret Professor of Divinity at Cambridge. This short-lived triannual journal, which they founded and edited from 1854 to 1859, is interesting both for its combination of classical and patristic material, illuminating the close relationship between theology and classics in the period, and as an example from the early history of academic journals, an emerging genre which would develop into its current form over the following decades. Volume 3, published in 1857, contains the previous year's issues and two responses concerning 'the Route of Hannibal'.
Contents
Part VII: 1. Observations on Mr Law's 'Criticism of Mr Ellis's new theory concerning the route of Hannibal' (cont.); 2. On the sophistical rhetoric; 3. Recent editions of St Paul's epistles; Adversaria; Correspondence; Notices of new books; Content of foreign journals; List of new books; Part VIII: 1. Hebrew notes; 2. On the eastern boundary of Naphtali, and the sites of Bethsaida and Capharnaum; 3. On the date of Justin Martyr; 4. Notes on the Agamemnon of Aeschylus; Adversaria; Anecdota; Notices of new books; Correspondence; Contents of foreign journals; List of new books; Part IX: 1. On the sophistical rhetoric; 2. On the style and character of the Epistle to the Galatians; 3. The Nundines, and early times of the Julian calendar; Adversaria; Notices of new books; Correspondence; Contents of foreign journals; List of new books; Announcements; Index; Reply to Mr Ellis's defence of his theory in the The Journal of Classical and Sacred Philology; Reply to the second part of Mr Ellis's defence of his theory in the The Journal of Classical and Sacred Philology.
