- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > 英文書
- > Philosophy
Full Description
Arguably the most transformative force in contemporary society is the commitment to justice through diversity. A prime example is the change justice through diversity has wrought on who enters, teaches and administers the university. It has changed the content of what is taught and the mission statements that define the purpose of higher education. What is rarely defined, however, is justice and how it is related to diversity. If justice is equality, are all differences equal? Are all differences in race, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, ethnicity, religion and culture equal? Should such differences be weighted differently and thus hierarchically? On what basis are those differences to be weighted and ranked to ensure equality? Justice Through Diversity brings together a Who's Who of contemporary scholars to explore these questions and others in an attempt to understand one of the central commitments in the modern world.
Contents
INTRODUCTION: Michael Sweeney, Xavier University
JUSTICE AND DIVERSITY FROM DIVERSE PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES
1.Peter Simpson, CUNY (Virtue Ethics): Justice and Diversity in Virtue Ethics
2.Thomas Hibbs, Baylor (Natural Law): Thomas Aquinas on Justice and the Diversity of Goods
3.Aaron Szymkowiak, Xavier University (Deontology): On Deontology: Is Diversity for Real?
4.Raymond Hain, Providence (Utilitarianism): Utilitarianism on Justice (and Diversity)
5.James Campbell, University of Toledo (American): Systems of Justice and the Role of the Moral Prophet
6.Paul Weithman, University of Notre Dame (Analytical): Justice through Diversity from an Analytical Perspective
7.Fred Evans, Duquesne (Postmodern): The Dilemma of Diversity: Rawls, Derrida, and Political Justice
PARTICULAR ISSUES IN JUSTICE AND DIVERSITY: PHILOSOPHY
1.Remi Brague, University of Paris: Diversity: How far?
2.Camille Paglia, University of the Arts: Intolerance and Diversity in Three Cities: Ancient Babylon, Renaissance Venice, and Nineteenth-Century Philadelphia
3.Gayatri Spivak, Columbia: Essentializing the Classed Other
4.Jorge Garcia, Boston College: Racist Disrespect in Moral Theory: Dialogue with Glasgow
5.Laura Garcia, Boston College: A Feminist Defense of the Complementarity Between Men and Women
6.Robert George, Princeton: Immigration and American Exceptionalism
7.John Corvino, Wayne State: What Marriage Can Be
8.Sherif Girgis, Princeton: Marriage: Whose Justice? Which Diversity?
JUSTICE AND DIVERSITY FROM DIVERSE THEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES
1.Peter Huff, University of Mary (Catholic): Dignum et Iustum: Justice, Diversity, and the Mystery of Catholicity
2.Pavel Gavrilyuk, University of St. Thomas (Eastern Orthodox): Diversity in Eastern Christianity: Historical Traumas and Cultural Dislocations
3.Stephen Long, Marquette (Protestant): Justice and Diversity: A Homogenous Protestant Project
4.David Novak, University of Toronto (Jewish): Justice, Diversity, and Tolerance in the Jewish Tradition
5.Waleed El-Ansary, Xavier University, and Muhammed Zia ul-Haq, University of Islamabad (Muslim): Unity and Religious Diversity in Islamic Theology, Shariah Law and Tradition
PARTICULAR ISSUES IN JUSTICE AND DIVERSITY: THEOLOGY
1.Virgilio Elizondo, Notre Dame: From Benevolent Tolerance to Humble Reverence: A Vision for a Multicultural Church
2.Shawn Copeland, Boston College: The Common Good, Freedom, and Difference
3.Russell Hittinger, University of Tulsa: Ordered Justice and the Diversity of Rights and Nations in Pacem in terries
4.Susannah Heschel, Dartmouth: Was National Socialism Political Religion? The Transformation of Christianity into a Nazi Religion during the Third Reich
5.Thomas Guarino, Seton Hall University: Vattimo, Diversity and Catholicism
6.Kwame Anthony Appiah, Princeton: Respecting Gay People: Justice and the Interpretation of Scriptural Traditions
7.Mary Healy, Sacred Heart Seminary: Homosexuality and the Word of God
8.Mark Jordon, Harvard: How (Not) To Debate Christian Sexual Ethics
John Grabowski, Catholic University of America: Not Just Love: The Anthropological Assumptions Of Catholic Teaching on Same-Sex Attraction and Activity
