国際紛争における先制と予防 Striking First : Preemption and Prevention in International Conflict (The University Center for Human Values Series)

国際紛争における先制と予防<br>Striking First : Preemption and Prevention in International Conflict (The University Center for Human Values Series)

個数：

国際紛争における先制と予防
Striking First : Preemption and Prevention in International Conflict (The University Center for Human Values Series)

Doyle, Michael W./ Macedo, Stephen (EDT)

ウェブストア価格 ¥5,137（本体¥4,670）
Princeton University Press（2011/03発売）
外貨定価 US$ 22.95
ポイント 46pt

提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
【重要ご説明事項】
1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて

【入荷遅延について】
世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。

◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。

◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。

製本 Paperback:紙装版/ペーパーバック版／ページ数 200 p.
言語 ENG
商品コード 9780691149967
DDC分類 341.58

基本説明

New in paperback. Hardcover was published in 2008. Edited and introduced by Stephen Macedo.

Full Description

Does the United States have the right to defend itself by striking first, or must it wait until an attack is in progress? Is the Bush Doctrine of aggressive preventive action a justified and legal recourse against threats posed by terrorists and rogue states? Tackling one of the most controversial policy issues of the post-September 11 world, Michael Doyle argues that neither the Bush Doctrine nor customary international law is capable of adequately responding to the pressing security threats of our times. In Striking First, Doyle shows how the Bush Doctrine has consistently disregarded a vital distinction in international law between acts of preemption in the face of imminent threats and those of prevention in the face of the growing offensive capability of an enemy. Taking a close look at the Iraq war, the 1998 attack against al Qaeda in Afghanistan, and the Cuban Missile Crisis, among other conflicts, he contends that international law must rely more completely on United Nations Charter procedures and develop clearer standards for dealing with lethal but not immediate threats.
After explaining how the UN can again play an important role in enforcing international law and strengthening international guidelines for responding to threats, he describes the rare circumstances when unilateral action is indeed necessary. Based on the 2006 Tanner Lectures at Princeton University, Striking First includes responses by distinguished political theorists Richard Tuck and Jeffrey McMahan and international law scholar Harold Koh, yielding a lively debate that will redefine how--and for what reasons--tomorrow's wars are fought.

Acknowledgments by Michael W. Doyle vii Introduction by Stephen Macedo xi Striking First Michael W. Doyle International Law and Current Standards 7 Standards 43 Comment by Harold Hongju Koh 99 Comment by Richard Tuck 119 Comment byJeff McMahan 129 Response to Commentators by Michael W. Doyle 149 Contributors 161 Index 165