Using Qualitative Methods in Institutional Assessment (New Directions for Institutional Research)

個数:

Using Qualitative Methods in Institutional Assessment (New Directions for Institutional Research)

  • 在庫がございません。海外の書籍取次会社を通じて出版社等からお取り寄せいたします。
    通常6~9週間ほどで発送の見込みですが、商品によってはさらに時間がかかることもございます。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合がございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Paperback:紙装版/ペーパーバック版/ページ数 98 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780470283615
  • DDC分類 370

Full Description


This volume advocates the broad use of qualitative methods in assessment across American higher education: campus cultures, academic success and retention programs, student experiences and learning, and teaching effectiveness. The chapter authors suggest that responses to demands for increased accountability will be insufficient if researchers continue to rely almost exclusively on statistical analyses to assess institutional effectiveness. Instead, they recommend a variety of qualitative approaches that can produce rich and instructive data to guide institutional decision-making and action. In addition, they dispel common myths and misconceptions regarding the use of qualitative methods in assessment. This is the 136th volume in the Jossey-Bass quarterly report series New Directions for Institutional Research, sponsored by the Association for Institutional Research. Always timely and comprehensive, New Directions for Institutional Research provides planners and administrators in all types of academic institutions with guidelines in such areas as resource coordination, information analysis, program evaluation, and institutional management.

Contents

EDITORS'NOTES ( Shaun R. Harper, Samuel D. Museus ). 1. Myths and Misconceptions About Using Qualitative Methods in Assessment ( Shaun R. Harper, George D. Kuh ) Erroneous assumptions about the adequacy of qualitative research have led to the underuse of these techniques in institutional assessment. 2. Enhancing Institutional Assessment Efforts Through Qualitative Methods ( Nancy Van Note Chism, Trudy W. Banta ) Qualitative methods, alone or in combination with quantitative techniques, are critical tools for developing in-depth understandings of focal phenomena and their contexts in institutional assessment. 3. Using Qualitative Methods to Assess Diverse Institutional Cultures ( Samuel D. Museus ) Qualitative techniques are necessary for conducting campus cultural assessments and to understand the role that institutional culture plays in the experiences and behaviors of individuals and groups on increasingly diverse college campuses. 4. Using Qualitative Methods to Assess Academic Success and Retention Programs for Underrepresented Minority Students ( Denise O'Neil Green ) Academic support and retention programs for underrepresented minority students can use qualitative assessment methods to meet the challenges posed by recent legal and political turbulence surrounding race-conscious initiatives. 5. Using Qualitative Methods to Assess Student Trajectories and College Impact ( Shaun R. Harper ) Moving beyond quantitative tallies and correlations to developing a rich understanding of how students navigate their educational environments and how to best meet their needs requires the use of interpretive research methods. 6. Using Qualitative Methods to Assess Student Learning in Higher Education ( Melissa Contreras-McGavin, Adrianna J. Kezar ) Qualitative approaches can help answer calls for accountability by enhancing the ability of institutional researchers to identify, comprehend, and convey what and how their students are learning. 7. Using Qualitative Methods to Assess Teaching Effectiveness ( Lisa R. Lattuca, Jennifer M. Domagal-Goldman ) It is important to transcend one-dimensional quantitative student evaluations of instructor performance and employ qualitative tools to develop a more holistic understanding of teaching effectiveness. INDEX.

最近チェックした商品