- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > 英文書
- > Literary Criticism
Full Description
The Critical Heritage gathers together a large body of critical sources on major figures in literature. Each volume presents contemporary responses to a writer's work, enabling students and researchers to read the material themselves.
Contents
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS, PREFACE, CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE, INTRODUCTION, The Bothie of Tober-na-Vuolich (1848), 1. MATTHEW ARNOLD to Clough 1848, 2. THACKERAY to Clough 1848, 3. Notice in Spectator 1848, 4. EDWARD QUILLINAN to Henry Crabb Robinson 1849, 5. EMERSON to Clough 1849, 6. J. A. FROUDE to Clough 1849, 7. CHARLES KINGSLEY, review in Fraser's Magazine 1849, 8. EMERSON, review in Massachusetts Quarterly Review 1849, 9. Review in Literary Gazette 1849, 10 ELIZABETH BARRETT BROWNING to Miss Mitford 1849, 11. W. M. ROSSETTI, review in the Germ 1850, 12. WILLIAM WHEWELL, review in North British Review 1853, 13. MATTHEW ARNOLD, from On Translating Homer 1861, Ambarvalia (1849), 14. MATTHEW ARNOLD to Clough 1847-9, 15. Review in Spectator 1849, 16. Review in Athenaeum 1849, 17. Review in Guardian 1849, 18. Review in Literary Gazette 1849, 19. JOHN CONINGTON (?), from a review in Fraser's Magazine 1849, 20. Review in Rambler 1849, 21. Review in Prospective Review 1850, Two tributes (1861), 22. A Commemorative Appreciation in Saturday Review 1861, 23. MATTHEW ARNOLD'S Oxford Tribute 1861, Poems by Arthur Hugh Clough (1862) (including Amours de Voyage, 1858), 24. FRANCIS TURNER PALGRAVE'S 'Memoir' 1862, 25. Clough and J. C. SHAIRP, an exchange on Amours de Voyage 1849, 26. EMERSON on Amours de Voyage 1858, 27. CHARLES ELIOT NORTON in Atlantic Monthly 1862, 28. Review in Saturday Review 1862, 29. HENRY FOTHERGILL CHORLEY, review in Athenaeum 1862, 30. DAVID MASSON, review in Macmillan's Magazine 1862, 31. G. H. LEWES, review in Cornhill Magazine 1862, 32. Review in Church and State Review 1862, 33. WALTER BAGEHOT on Clough, National Review 1862, 34. W. Y. SELLAR, from a review in North British Review 1862, 35. From a review in Boston Review 1863, Letters and Remains of Arthur Hugh Clough (1865), 36. WILLIAM ALLINGHAM, from an article in Fraser's Magazine 1866, 37. w. H. SMITH, from an article in Macmillatt's Magazine 1866, The Poems and Prose Remains (1869), 38. JOHN ADDINGTON SYMONDS, a new appraisal in Fortnightly Review 1868, 39. R. H. HUTTON, from a review in Spectator 1869, 40. Review in Saturday Review 1869, 41. HENRY SIDGWICK, review in Westminster Review 1869, 42. From a review in Putnam's Magazine 1869, Later estimates (to 1920), 43. EDWARD DOWDEN on Clough, 1874, 1877, 44. BISHOP ARTHUR T. LYTTELTON on Arnold and Clough 1878, 45. Clough and Arnold, review in Nation 1878, 46. SAMUEL WADDINGTON, from the first biography 1883, 47. R. H. HUTTON on Clough's unpopularity, Spectator 1882, 48. R. H. HUTTON, 'Amiel and Clough', Spectator 1886, 49. Review in Saturday Review 1888, 50. COVENTRY PATMORE on Clough, St.James's Gazette 1888, 51. LIONEL JOHNSON, from a review in Academy 1891, 52. A. C. SWINBURNE debunks Clough in Fortllll 1891, 53. GEORGE SAINTSBURY on Clough 1896, 54. J. M. ROBERTSON re-appraises Clough 1897, 55. A retort to Robertson in Academy 1897, 56. E. FORSTER supports Robertson in Academy 1897, 57. STOPFORD A. BROOKE on Clough 1908, 58. Article on Clough in Contemporary Review 1914, 59. MARTHA HALE SHACKFORD, essay for the Clough Centenary 1919, 60. JAMES INSLEY OSBORNE, from his centenary biography 1920, 61. A. S. MCDOWALL reviews Osborne, The Times Literary Supplement 1920, SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY, INDEX
