Against Long Odds : Citizens Who Challenge Congressional Incumbents

個数:

Against Long Odds : Citizens Who Challenge Congressional Incumbents

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 216 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780275966423
  • DDC分類 324.50973

基本説明

From the unique vantage of credible citizen-candidates who ran against congressional incumbents from Massachusetts to Hawaii during the 1990s, it tackles the question of why incumbents nearly always win.

Full Description

While many books detail how senators and representatives operate in Washington, this one describes how they stay in power. The congressional elections of 1998 were the most expensive in history. Incumbency reelection rates were 98.3 percent in the House and 89.7 percent in the Senate, and this was a typical outcome after Watergate-era campaign reforms supposedly reduced the influence of money in politics. From the unique vantage of credible citizen-candidates who ran against congressional incumbents from Massachusetts to Hawaii during the 1990s, Against Long Odds tackles the question of why incumbents nearly always win.

These citizen-challengers learned that the system is rigged against them. Incumbents prevail through a virtual monopoly on campaign cash, lavish congressional perks, local media and business backing, intimidation of their challengers' supporters, and sometimes outright dirty tricks. This is true for Republicans and Democrats; for conservatives, moderates, and liberals alike. This account details, as no other book has, how representatives and senators are zealous participants in a system that threatens to overturn the American traditions of free elections and the free exchange of ideas. Frustrated voters often complain that, no matter which party controls Congress, nothing ever really seems to change. Merriner and Senter explain why.

Contents

Foreword by Hon. Richard D. Lamm
Preface
Introduction
Massachusetts: Mitt Romney (R) v. Senator Ted Kennedy (D)
New York: Joseph J. DioGuardi (R) v. Representative Sue Kelly (R)
Pennsylvania: Charles Gerow (R) v. Representative Bill Goodling (R)
Virginia: Oliver L. North (R) v. Senator Charles S. Robb (D)
Virginia: James C. Miller (R) v. Senator John Warner (R)
South Carolina: Elliott Springs Close v. (D) Senator Strom Thurmond (R)
Georgia: Michael Coles (D) v. Representative Newt Gingrich (R) and Senator Paul Coverdell (R)
Ohio: Cliff Arnebeck (R/D) v. Representatives Chalmers Wylie (R) and Deborah Pryce (R)
Illinois: Dick Simpson (D) and Michael P. Flanagan v. (R) Representative Dan Rostenkowski (D)
Texas: Ron Paul (R) v. Representative Greg Laughlin (D/R) and Chuck Morris (D)
Idaho: Walter Minnick (D) v. Senator Larry Craig (R)
Oregon: Harry Lonsdale (D) v. Senator Mark Hatfield (R), Representative Les AuCoin (D) and Tom Gruggere (D)
Alaska: David Cuddy (R) v. Senator Ted Stevens (R)
Hawaii: Orson G. Swindle (R) v. Representative Neil Abercrombie (D)
Conclusion
Bibliographical Essay
Index

最近チェックした商品