権限委譲のルール変化:EUのコミトロジー制度と権力争い<br>Changing Rules of Delegation : A Contest for Power in Comitology

個数:

権限委譲のルール変化:EUのコミトロジー制度と権力争い
Changing Rules of Delegation : A Contest for Power in Comitology

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • ≪洋書のご注文について≫ 「海外取次在庫あり」「国内在庫僅少」および「国内仕入れ先からお取り寄せいたします」表示の商品でもクリスマス前(12/20~12/25)および年末年始までにお届けできないことがございます。あらかじめご了承ください。

  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 192 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780199653621
  • DDC分類 341.242224

基本説明

The book explores how institutional rules are constantly re-negotiated and may lead to a power-shift between the concerned actors. It particularly shows how the European Parliament has been able to shift the power balance in its own favour.

Full Description

With each legislative issue, legislators have to decide whether to delegate decision-making to the executive and/or to expert bodies in order to flesh out the details of this legislation, or, alternatively, to spell out all aspects of this decision in legislation proper. The reasons why to delegate have been of prime interest to political science. The debate has concentrated on principal-agent theory to explain why politicians delegate decision-making to bureaucrats, to independent regulatory agencies, and to others actors and how to control these agents. By contrast, Changing Rules of Delegation focuses on these questions: Which actors are empowered by delegation? Are executive actors empowered over legislative actors? How do legislative actors react to the loss of power? What opportunities are there to change the institutional rules governing delegation in order to (re)gain institutional power and, with it influence over policy outcomes? The authors analyze the conditions and processes of change of the rules that delegate decision-making power to the Commission's implementing powers under comitology. Focusing on the role of the European Parliament the authors explain why the Commission, the Council, and increasingly the Parliament, delegated decision-making to the Commission. If they chose delegation, they still have to determine under which institutional rule comitology should operate. These rules, too, distribute power unequally among actors and therefore raise the question of how they came about in the first place and whether and how the "losers" of a rule change seek to alter the rules at a later point in time.

Contents

Introduction ; 1. European Legislation and Comitology: The Development of the Comitology System ; 2. Theory and Hypotheses ; 3. Changing the Rules of Comitology: More Competences for the Parliament ; 4. Delegation Under the Lisbon Treaty ; 5. Patterns and Trends In European Legislation and Delegation ; 6. The Impact of Codecision on Comitology ; 7. The Impact of the 1999 Comitology Decision ; 8. Conclusion ; References ; Appendix 1 The Data: Sources And Classification ; Appendix 2 Directory Codes ; Appendix 3 The Number of Laws Adopted In Policy Areas Per 5 Years ; Appendix 4 The Average Number of Laws In Force In Policy Area Per 5 Years ; Appendix 5 Directives and Regulations by Author Institution and Legal Basis

最近チェックした商品