フレーゲにおけるアイデンティティ<br>Frege: Identity Challenges Reflection : A Revisionist View

個数:

フレーゲにおけるアイデンティティ
Frege: Identity Challenges Reflection : A Revisionist View

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 352 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780198926528
  • DDC分類 160

Full Description

The received view of identity takes it to be a binary relation between objects like many others: specifically, identity is thought to be the binary relation every object bears to itself and to no others. As such, it is supposed to play a fundamental role in our conceptual scheme. It is also widely held that Gottlob Frege (1848-1925), after a false start in his Begriffsschrift of 1879, where he proposed that identity is a relation between signs, eventually came round to the now mainstream view, the first paragraph of his celebrated 1892 essay "On Sense and Reference" marking the transition. In Frege: Identity Challenges Reflection, Ulrich Pardey and Kai F. Wehmeier show that common wisdom is mistaken on both counts. First, careful exegesis shows that Frege did not repudiate the earlier, sign-based conception of identity in his 1892 essay, but instead defended it; moreover, that conception is in no way refuted by the collection of formal and philosophical objections that have been raised against it in subsequent decades. In particular, the Begriffsschrift theory of identity, far from being incompatible with quantification over objects, in fact affords an elegant, ontologically conservative integration of identity into predicate logic. Second, Pardey and Wehmeier argue that our conceptual scheme is not at all committed to a binary relation that every object bears to itself and only itself. Moreover, the tension between the alleged binarity of the identity relation and the logical impossibility of its ever relating two things, famously pointed out by Wittgenstein in the Tractatus, forms the basis of an argument for the logical incoherence of such a relation.

Contents

Foreword
Abbreviations of Works by Frege
General Introduction
Part I Frege>'s Conception of Identity
0: Preliminary Remarks
1: Identity in CS and in SR
2: Bifurcation in Meaning
3: Arithmetic Equality and Equality of Content
4: Frege>'s Adoption of Leibniz>'s Conception
5: The Structure of the First Paragraph of SR
6: Cognitive Value
7: The Trivial Conception of Self-Identity
8: The Arbitrary Connection
9: A Transition Step
10: The Connection via Mode of Presentation
11: Objections from Translation
12: Conclusion of Part I
13: Appendix: Frege>'s Texts
Part II Against Objectual Identity
0: Roadmap
1: Notions of Identity
2: Identity and Quantification
3: Identity and Wittgensteinian Quantifiers
4: The CS Theory of Identity
5: Identity and Arity
General Conclusion
Bibliography
Index

最近チェックした商品