- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > 英文書
- > Philosophy
Full Description
Debating Libertarianism offers readers a sustained debate between two leading political philosophers over which vision of society--Rawlsian left-liberalism or libertarianism--is best and most just. In this crucial and timely book, Samuel Freeman and Jason Brennan consider both fundamental questions of justice and issues of applied policy. Along the way, they debate which economic rights people have; whether democracy liberates people and is essential for social equality, or is merely a tool to promote justice; the justification and extent of property rights and of taxation; whether the fact that freedom permits people to make bad choices is a reason to limit freedom; and whether the modern welfare state is necessary for social justice or instead a barrier to it. Debating Libertarianism offers readers both a succinct defence and critique of two important conceptions of what makes institutions just and good.
Contents
PART 1: The Case Against
Samuel Freeman
Introduction
Chapter 1: Liberalism and Libertarianism
Chapter 2: Ideal Libertarianism and the Orthodox View
Chapter 3: Liberal Libertarianism
Chapter 4: Neoliberalism--the Intersection of Classical Liberalism and Libertarianism
Chapter 5: High Liberalism and Distributive Justice
PART 2: The Case For
Jason Brennan
Introduction
Chapter 6: Rawlsian Liberalism: Why Not
Chapter 7: Why Not Libertarianism?
Chapter 8: Anti-Social Democracy: A Libertarian Left-Wing Critique
PART 3: Responses
Chapter 9: Response to Brennan
Chapter 10: Response to Freeman
Part 1 Bibliography
Part 2 Bibliography
Index



