懐疑に対する戦い:科学者と一般人の隙間をどうつなぐか<br>The Fight against Doubt : How to Bridge the Gap between Scientists and the Public

個数:
電子版価格
¥4,423
  • 電子版あり

懐疑に対する戦い:科学者と一般人の隙間をどうつなぐか
The Fight against Doubt : How to Bridge the Gap between Scientists and the Public

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 232 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780190869229
  • DDC分類 306.45

Full Description

The lack of public support for climate change policies and refusals to vaccinate children are just two alarming illustrations of the impacts of dissent about scientific claims. Dissent can lead to confusion, false beliefs, and widespread public doubt about highly justified scientific evidence. Even more dangerously, it has begun to corrode the very authority of scientific consensus and knowledge. Deployed aggressively and to political ends, some dissent can intimidate scientists, stymie research, and lead both the public and policymakers to oppose important public policies firmly rooted in science.

To criticize dissent is, however, a fraught exercise. Skepticism and fearless debate are key to the scientific process, making it both vital and incredibly difficult to characterize and identify dissent that is problematic in its approach and consequences. Indeed, as de Melo-Martín and Intemann show, the criteria commonly proposed as means of identifying inappropriate dissent are flawed and the strategies generally recommended to tackle such dissent are not only ineffective but could even make the situation worse.

The Fight Against Doubt proposes that progress on this front can best be achieved by enhancing the trustworthiness of the scientific community and by being more realistic about the limits of science when it comes to policymaking. It shows that a richer understanding of the context in which science operates is needed to disarm problematic dissent and those who deploy it. This, the authors argue, is the best way forward, rather than diagnosing the many instances of wrong-headed dissent.

Contents

Chapter 1. Dissent and its Discontents
Chapter 2. The Important Roles of Dissent
Chapter 3. Bad Faith Dissent
Chapter 4. Failing to Play by the Rules
Chapter 5. Imposing Unfair Risks
Chapter 6. Dealing with Normatively Inappropriate Dissent
Chapter 7. The Relevance of Trust
Chapter 8. Scientific Practices and the Erosion of Trust
Chapter 9. Values in Science and the Erosion of Trust
Chapter 10. Where Disagreements can Lie: Attending to Values in Policy
Chapter 11: Lessons Learned and New Directions

最近チェックした商品