Description
This Element introduces the arguments of three prominent Platonic critics of Heidegger – Leo Strauss (1899–1973), Hans-Georg Gadamer (1900–2002), and Jan Patočka (1907–1977) – with the aim of evaluating the trenchancy of their criticisms. The author shows that these three thinkers uncover novel ways of reading Plato non-metaphysically (where metaphysics is understood in the Heideggerian sense) and thus of undermining Heidegger's narrative concerning Platonism as metaphysics and metaphysics as Platonism. In their readings of the Platonic dialogues, Plato emerges as a proto-phenomenologist whose attention to the ethical-political facticity of human beings leads to the acknowledgment of human finitude and of the fundamental elusiveness of Being. These Platonic critics of Heidegger thus invite us to see in the dialogues a lucid presentation of philosophic questioning rather than the beginning of distorting doctrinal teachings.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction; 2. Strauss' Zetetic Platonism; 3. Gadamer's Dialogical Platonism 4. Patočka's Negative Platonism; 5. Conclusion: Heidegger and the Plato Who Could Have Been; List of Abbreviations; References.
-
- 電子書籍
- コミックヘヴン 2024年 2/10号…
-
- 洋書電子書籍
- A Tale of Two Valle…
-
- 電子書籍
- 天馬の血族 (20)
-
- 電子書籍
- 恥じらう肌 1巻 芳文社コミックス
-
- 電子書籍
- からくりサーカス(3) 少年サンデーコ…



