Description
"It was the objection of David Hume,"Kant wrote, "that first [. . .] interrupted my dogmatic slumber"; "it was the fourfold Antinomy [. . .]," he wrote later, "that first woke me from dogmatic slumber." How can Kant have been woken both by Hume and by the Antinomy? In The Skeptical Roots of Critique, Abraham Anderson solves this problem by showing that the Antinomy was inspired by Hume's skepticism, whose primary target was metaphysics and especially theology. The Critique is not the refutation of that skepticism, but "the execution of Hume's problem in its broadest possible elaboration." In showing that the Antinomy flows from Hume, this work connects Kant with the skeptical tradition, and particularly with the antitheological skepticism of Hume's master Bayle. Like Hume's Enquiry and Dialogues, the Critique is part of the battle for Enlightenment, the struggle against the "despotic" reign of theological dogmatism.
Table of Contents
Bibliographical NotePrefaceAcknowledgmentsIntroduction: The State of the Question1. Awakening from Dogmatic Slumber: Sextus, Hume, and the Roots of Transcendental Idealism2. The Impact of the Dialogues3. Skeptical Method in the Discipline and the Antinomy: The Debt to the Dialogues4. Rousseau, Hume, and the Dreams of a Spirit-Seer5. The Logik Blomberg on Skeptical Method and Kant's Reading of the Enquiry6. The Philosopher and the Common Understanding: Beattie vs. Hume, and the First Interruption of Dogmatic Slumber in the Antinomy7. “That impious maxim of the ancient philosophy”8. “All the philosophers of antiquity, with the sole exception of the Epicurean School”: Clarke, Bayle, and Hume on the creation of matter and the roots of the Antinomy9. Hume and Clarke in the Beweisgrund10. “If, for instance, I at this moment arise from my chair”: Clarke's Demonstration and the AntinomyAfterwordBibliographyIndex
-
- 電子書籍
- タンデムスタイル２０１７年８月号
-
- 電子書籍
- RIDERS CLUB No.116 …
