Full Description
This book presents an in-depth discussion on two concepts from the field of philosophy and law, in order to improve our understanding of the relation between "fact" and "evidence" in judicial process. Since fact-finding is a difficult task for judges, proof by evidence has been devised to help them access the truth. However, in the process of judicial fact-finding, there is always a gap between fact and truth. This book covers a wide range of topics, from reflections on the concept of "fact," "evidence" and "fact-finding" in the field of philosophy and law to individual case studies. As such it is a useful reference resource on the continuing research on the judicial proof process for students and scholars.
Contents
Facts and Evidence in Philosophical Epistemology.- Facts and Evidence in Juridical Epistemology.- Facts and Evidence in Criminal Trials.
![The Diversity of Irony (Cognitive Linguistics Research [CLR] 65) （2022. VIII, 307 S. 48 b/w and 16 col. ill., 8 b/w tbl. 230 mm）](../images/goods/ar/work/imgdatak/31107/3110777517.jpg)
