U.S. Supreme Court Precedents on Arbitration : Shaping the American Arbitration Law and Practice (International Litigation in Practice)

個数:

U.S. Supreme Court Precedents on Arbitration : Shaping the American Arbitration Law and Practice (International Litigation in Practice)

  • 在庫がございません。海外の書籍取次会社を通じて出版社等からお取り寄せいたします。
    通常6~9週間ほどで発送の見込みですが、商品によってはさらに時間がかかることもございます。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合がございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 458 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9789004715813
  • DDC分類 341.5220973

Full Description

For every lawyer practicing or aspiring to practice law in the US and every student striving to become a well-rounded litigator, familiarity with relevant case law is indispensable. This axiom holds particularly true in the realm of arbitration. As the ultimate arbiter on arbitration matters in the US, the decisions of the US Supreme Court carry paramount significance. This book serves as a vital resource, offering detailed analysis of nearly 40 cases by arbitration experts well-versed in the intricacies of the US legal system. Through meticulous commentary and critique, it vividly illustrates how SCOTUS has profoundly influenced the landscape of arbitration law and practice over the years.

Contents

Notes on Contributors

Editors' Note

1 Supreme Court Case Law on Arbitration through a Restatement Lens

  George A. Bermann

2 The Evolution of Arbitration in Light of Supreme Court Decisions

  Peter J. Messitte, Carlos Mário da Silva Velloso, Erico Bomfim de Carvalho and João Carlos Banhos Velloso

3 The Importance of the U.S. Supreme Court in Shaping U.S. Arbitration Law & Practice

  Daniel Schimmel, Shrutih Tewarie and James Fullmer

4 Prima Paint Corporation v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Company (1967)

  R. Doak Bishop and Marcio Vasconcellos

5 Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Cas. Co. (1968): The Supreme Court's Fractured Interpretation of "Evident Partiality" under the Federal Arbitration Act and Its Legacy

  Ank Santens, Surya Gopalan and Stephen Hogan-Mitchell

6 Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co. (1974)

  Michael B. Carlinsky and Andre Luis Monteiro

7 Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. et al., 473 US. 614 (1985)

  Sherman Kahn

8 Shearson/Am. Exp., Inc v. Mcmahon (1987)

  Steven Skulnik

9 Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University (1989)

  Peter Fox

10 First Options of Chicago, Inc v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938 (1995): To Delegate or Not to Delegate, Forty Years On

  Kabir Duggal, Yasmine Lahlou, Carlos Alberto Carmona and Gustavo Favero Vaughn

11 Vimar Seguros y Reaseguros, s.a. v. m/v Sky Reefer et al. (1995)

  Rodrigo Tannuri, Matheus Soubhia Sanches, Felipe Conrado and Rekha Rangachari

12 Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., 514 U.S. 52 (1995)

  Caline Mouawad and Alex Lupsaiu

13 Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (2002)

  Gary L. Benton

14 PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc. v. Book (2003)

  Samaa Haridi and Jessica Beess und Chrostin

15 Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle (2003): The Supreme Court's First Look at Class Action Arbitrability

  Andrew Behrman, Yining Bei and Zeinab Bailoun

16 Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (2004)

  Preeti Bhagnani and Stephen Hogan-Mitchell

17 Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc., v. Cardegna (2006)

  Lea Haber Kuck

18 Hall Street Associates, l.l.c. v. Mattel, Inc. (2008): The Scope and Limits of Party Autonomy: Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards

  Peter B. Rutledge

19 Vaden v. Discover Bank, 556 U.S. 49 (2009)

  Dana MacGrath

20 Rent-A-Center West, Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S. 63 (2010)

  Zachary Kady and Rahim Moloo

21 Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds Int'l Corp., 559 U.S. 662 (2010): The Impact of the Stolt-Nielsen Decision on Class-Action Arbitration

  Andrew Finn and Pedro José Izquierdo

22 Granite Rock Co. v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters (2010)

  Steven Skulnik

23 at&t Mobility llc v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011)

  Grant Hanessian

24 Oxford Health Plans llc v. Sutter (2013)

  James Hosking, Gretta Walters and Marcel Engholm

25 American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant (2013)

  Fabiano Robalinho, Caetano Berenguer and João Lucas Bevilacqua

26 bg Group, Plc v. Republic of Argentina, 572 U.S. 25 (2014)

  Elliot Friedman and Cameron Russell

27 Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela (2019): The Supreme Court Limits Class Arbitration

  John Fellas

28 New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira, 139 S. Ct. 532 (2019)

  Michael A. Fernández

29 Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc. (2019): The Henry Schein Dispute—Uncertainty Regarding Arbitral Jurisdiction and the End of the Wholly Groundless Exception

  Mark Kantor

30 ge Energy Power Conversion France sas Corp v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, llc (2020): Application of U.S. Domestic Arbitration Law to Non-Signatory Enforcement of International Arbitration Agreements, and other Potential Impacts of Domestic Arbitration Doctrines in International Contexts

  Ari D. MacKinnon, Jonathan I. Blackman and Katie L. Gonzalez

31 zf Automotive, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd. and Alixpartners, llp v. Fund for Protection of Investors' Rights in Foreign States (2022)

  Flávio Luiz Yarshell and Rafael Stefanini Auilo

32 Morgan V. Sundance, Inc. (2022)

  Liz Snodgrass and Laura França Pereira

33 Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana (2022)

  Eduardo Damião Gonçalves, Arthur Gonzalez Cronemberger Parente and Laura Lambert da Costa

34 Coinbase v. Bielski (2023): Shift from Judicial Discretion to a Mandatory Stay of Proceedings Pending Resolution of an Interlocutory Appeal from the Denial of a Motion to Compel Arbitration

  Boaz S. Morag and Peter E. Carzis

35 Cmb Monaco V. Smagin (2023)

  Katharine Menéndez de la Cuesta and Rafael Francisco Alves

36 Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski et al. (2024): Delegation versus Forum Selection Clause, Contradictory Contracts, and Kompetenz-Kompetenz Doctrine

  Peter C. Sester

Index

最近チェックした商品