The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction ratione materiae of Investment Treaty Tribunals : The Partial Revival of the Localisation Theory? (Nijhoff International Investment Law Series)

個数:

The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction ratione materiae of Investment Treaty Tribunals : The Partial Revival of the Localisation Theory? (Nijhoff International Investment Law Series)

  • 在庫がございません。海外の書籍取次会社を通じて出版社等からお取り寄せいたします。
    通常6~9週間ほどで発送の見込みですが、商品によってはさらに時間がかかることもございます。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合がございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 410 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9789004469594
  • DDC分類 346.092

Full Description

The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction ratione materiae of Investment Treaty Tribunals: The Partial Revival of the Localisation Theory? focuses on the largely unexplored role of the host state law in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals. Given domestic law's essential role in subject-matter jurisdiction issues, and in the light of the broader function of host state law and host state courts in contemporary investment treaty law, the author argues that the dormant "localisation" theory that was raised and defended by developing countries in the 1960s-1970s in the context of foreign investment contract disputes has now been partially revived in the area of the investment treaty law. This is a significant milestone in the ongoing discussions on the reform of the investment treaty dispute settlement regime.

Contents

Acknowledgments

List of Abbreviations

Introduction

 I The Relevance of the Host State Domestic Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations: Revival of the Localisation Theory?

 II Questions and Arguments

 III Structure

 IV Essential Concepts

  A Applicable Law

  B Domestic Law

 V Approach and Sources

  A General Approach

  B Interpretive Approach

  C Sources

PART 1

The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction ratione materiae of An Investment Treaty Tribunal

1 The Role of Domestic Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations in General

 Introduction

 Section One: General Remarks with Regard to the Application of Domestic Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations

  A The Reason for the Importance of Host State Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations

  B The Guise in Which Domestic Law Applies in Investment Treaty Arbitrations: As Fact or as Law?

  C The Legal Grounds of the Application of Domestic Law as Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations

   A The Parties Have Expressly or Impliedly Chosen Domestic Law to Govern a Particular Issue

   B The Nature of the Legal Issue

  D The Irrelevance of the Applicable Law Provision in Investment Treaties and the ICSID Convention

 Section Two: The Situations in Which an Investment Treaty Tribunal Has to Refer to Domestic Laws

 A The Role of Domestic Law in Jurisdictional Issues

  A Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae

   I The Legality of Investment

   II Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment

   III Approval of Investments

  B Ratione Personae

 B The Role of Domestic Law in Issues Concerning Merits

  A Domestic Law as Fact in Issues Concerning Merits

  B Domestic Law as Law in Issues Concerning Merits

   I Express Treaty Reference to the Application of Domestic Law as Law

   II Contractual Claims

 Section Three: Ascertaining the Contents of the Host State Law: Methods and Means

  A Ascertaining the Contents of the Host State Law: Methods

  B Ascertaining the Contents of the Host State Law: Means

  C Conclusion on the Methods and Means of Ascertaining the Contents of the Host State Law

 Conclusion

 Introduction to Chapters 2 & 3: The Role of Domestic Law in Determining the Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae of Investment Treaty Tribunals

2 Application of Domestic Law to the Legality Requirement

 Section One: The Legal Bases for Referring to the Laws of the Host State

  A Agreement by the Contracting Parties in the Underlying Investment Treaty

   A Express Agreement of the Treaty Contracting Parties

   I Varying Formulations and Its Impact

   II Varying Locations and Its Impact

  B Implicit Reference

  B The Nature of the Legal Issue

  C Relying on Principles of International Law for Dismissing Illegal Investments

 Section Two: The Actual Application of Domestic Law to Particular Questions Regarding the Legality Requirement

  A The Scope of the Legality Requirement

   A The Formal Scope of the Legality Requirement

   B The Substantive Scope of the Legality Requirement

   I Approaches Adopted in Investment Treaty Arbitrations

   II The Proposed Solution Regarding the Substantive Scope of the Legality Requirement

   C Temporal Scope of the Legality Requirement

   D Conclusions on the Scope of the Legality Requirement

  B The Consequences of the Application of the Legality Requirement

   A General and Specific Consequences of the Legality Requirement

   I General Consequence of Illegality

   II Specific Consequence of Illegality

   III The Missing Jurisdictional Condition

   B Possible Defences by Investors

   I Object and Purpose of the Underlying Investment Treaty

   II The Involvement of the Host State

 Conclusion

3 Application of Domestic Law to Questions Regarding the Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment

 Introduction

 Section One: The Applicable Law to the Question of Determining the Meaning, Scope, and the Legal Bearings of Rights over Property Constituting Investment

  A Agreement by the Contracting Parties in the Underlying Investment Treaty

   I Express Choice by the Contracting Parties in the Underlying Investment Treaty

   II Implied Choice by the Contracting Parties in the Underlying Investment Treaty

  B The Nature of the Legal Issue

  C Conclusion

 Section Two: The Actual Application of Domestic Law to Particular Questions Regarding the Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment

  A The General Function of Host State Law in Determining the Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment

  B The Specific Function of Host State Law in Determining the Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment

   A Definition of Property

   B Conditions for Transfer of Title

   C Conditions for Protection of Contractual Rights

 Conclusion

PART 2

The Revival of the Localisation Theory in Light of the Developments in Investment Treaty Law

4 The Localisation Theory

 Roots, Premises, and Its Legal Destiny

 Introduction

 Section One: Classic State-Centric Theories: The Calvo Doctrine and the Localisation Theory

 Section Two: The Emergence of Bilateral Investment Treaties

 Conclusion

5 Partial Revival of the Localisation Theory in the Field of Investment Treaty Arbitration: The Current Role of Host State Law and Host State Court

 Introduction

 Section One: The Current Role of Host State Law

  A A Distillation of Chapters 1-3 regarding the Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction ratione materiae of An Investment Treaty Tribunal

  B Developments in Investment Treaty Law Regarding the Role of Host State Law in the Resolution of Investment Treaty Arbitration Cases

   A Developments in Investment Treaty Rulemaking Regarding the Role of Host State Law in the Resolution of Investment Treaty Arbitration Cases

    I Shift in the Approach towards the Role of the Host State Law in the Indian Model Investment Treaties

    II Shift in the Approach towards the Role of the Host State Law in the Dutch Model Investment Treaties

   A Developments in Investment Treaty Jurisprudence Regarding the Role of Host State Law in the Resolution of Investment Treaty Arbitration Cases

 Conclusion

 Section Two: The Current Role of Host State Courts

  A Recourse to Local Remedies for A Defined Period As A Precondition of Filing the Case before International Investment Arbitration

  B Recourse to Host State Court As A Prerequisite of the Establishment of the Violation of Investment Treaty Standards

  C Recourse to Host State Court's Determinations As A Point of Reference for Clarifying Preliminary Points of the Domestic Law

   A The Interplay between Investment Treaty Tribunal and Host State Court in Substantive Matters

   B Jurisprudence of International Courts and Tribunals with Regard to the Weight and Value of Host State Court's Determinations in International Proceedings

   C Concerns over the Legitimacy of Host State Court's Determinations

   D Proposed Solutions to the Legitimacy Concerns

  D Recourse to Host State Court As An Investment Dispute Settlement Venue

  A Host State Court as the Sole Venue for the Final Resolution of All Investment Treaty Disputes upon the Irreversible Choice by the Investor: Fork-in-the-Road Clauses

  B Host State Court as an Alternative Venue for the Final Resolution of All Investment Treaty Disputes

  C Host State Court as the Sole Venue for the Final Resolution of All Investment Treaty Disputes

  D Host State Court as the Sole Venue for the Final Resolution of Certain Investment Disputes

 Conclusion

Final Conclusion

Sources

Index

最近チェックした商品