Comparative Constitutional History : Volume Two: Uses of History in Constitutional Adjudication (History of European Political and Constitutional Thought)

個数：

Comparative Constitutional History : Volume Two: Uses of History in Constitutional Adjudication (History of European Political and Constitutional Thought)

Biagi, Francesco (EDT)/ Frosini, Justin O. (EDT)/ Mazzone, Jason (EDT)

ウェブストア価格 ¥28,404（本体¥25,822）
Brill（2022/12発売）
外貨定価 US$ 131.00
ポイント 258pt

提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
【重要ご説明事項】
1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて

【入荷遅延について】
世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。

◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。

◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。

製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版／ページ数 392 p.
言語 ENG
商品コード 9789004437050
DDC分類 342

Full Description

Constitutions are a product of history, but what is the role of history in interpreting and applying constitutional provisions? This volume addresses that question from a comparative perspective, examining different uses of history by courts in determining constitutional meaning. The book shows that there is considerable debate around the role of history in constitutional adjudication. Are, for example, historical public debates over the adoption of a constitution relevant to reading its provisions today? If a constitution represents a break from a prior repressive regime, should courts construe the constitution's provisions in light of that background? Are former constitutions relevant to interpreting a new constitution? Through an assessment of current practices the volume offers some lessons for the future practices of courts as they adjudicate constitutional cases.

Contributors are: Mark D. Rosen, Jorge M. Farinacci-Fernós, Justin Collings, Jean-Christophe Bédard-Rubin, Cem Tecimer, Ángel Aday Jiménez Alemán, Ana Beatriz Robalinho, Keigo Obayashi, Zoltán Szente, Shih-An Wang, and Diego Werneck Arguelhes.

Acknowledgments

List of Tables

Notes on Contributors

Introduction

Francesco Biagi, Justin O. Frosini and Jason Mazzone

Part 1

Framing the Problem

1 History Limit or License in Constitutional Adjudication?

Mark D. Rosen

2 When History Requires the Use of History in Constitutional Adjudication

Jorge M. Farinacci-Fernós

3 Memory as Mantle Evil Pasts and Judges' Power in Germany and South Africa

Justin Collings

Part 2

Historical Precedents and Inter-constitutional Interpretation

4 Comparing Constitutional Historicities The Case of Precedents in Canada and the United States

Jean-Christophe Bédard-Rubin

5 Inter-constitutional Interpretation A Case Study of the Articles of Confederation

Cem Tecimer

Part 3

A Matter of Narratives

6 Janus' Third Face? The Spanish Constitutional Court at the Crossroads of History

Ángel Aday Jiménez Alemán

7 Competing Narratives The Use of Historical Arguments in Constitutional Interpretation in Brazil

Ana Beatriz Robalinho

8 Manipulating Constitutional, Legislative and Judicial History Incremental Judicial Activism in the Japanese Supreme Court

Keigo Obayashi

Part 4

New Democracies and Illiberal Regimes

9 How Not to Use History in Constitutional Interpretation The Aborted Resurrection of the Historical Constitution in Hungary

Zoltán Szente

10 Using the Authoritarian Past for Constitutional Interpretation in New Democracies The Example of the Taiwan Constitutional Court

Shih-An Wang

Conclusion Which History, Whose Past?

Diego Werneck Arguelhes

Index