A Model-Framework on Ethical Decision-Making for Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in the Philippines (2022. 100 S. 9 Farbabb. 230 mm)

個数:

A Model-Framework on Ethical Decision-Making for Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in the Philippines (2022. 100 S. 9 Farbabb. 230 mm)

  • 在庫がございません。海外の書籍取次会社を通じて出版社等からお取り寄せいたします。
    通常6~9週間ほどで発送の見込みですが、商品によってはさらに時間がかかることもございます。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合がございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Paperback:紙装版/ペーパーバック版
  • 商品コード 9783962032401

Description


(Text)
This study aimed to develop a model-framework drawn from the predominant pattern and generic sequence of ethical decision-making preferences of the middle-level school managers of Higher Education Institutions with Centers of Excellence in Teacher Education (HEIs-COETE) in the Philippines. There were sixteen (16) institutions which were the respondents, one institution per region. These were institutions with "Centers of Excellence in Teacher Education". The respondents included the HEI-COETEs from Region I to Region XII, including CARAGA and NCR. In each of the institutions per region, the middle-level managers or the Deans of the teacher education program were considered as the respondents. The data were gathered through the ethical decision-making instrument (ERAI) of Bautista (2012).The study revealed that in terms of the predominant sequence and pattern among the 16 HEI-COETEs, in the Philippines, the predominant pattern and generic sequence were identical with the current practices. When it comes to ranking the Deans practice, the ethic of profession was topmost as it has the highest average score. When it comes to the pattern categorized with Daft's domain of ethical management the order remains the same. It was revealed that among the 16 institutions, the predominant pattern that the respondents had chosen is the domain of ethics with the ethic of profession and ethic of community embedded in it. Last is the domain of free choice, with the ethic of care and critique. Interviews from the Deans revealed that among them, this domain also came last. Based on the results on the current preferences of the middle level managers, generally, they observed a guide, which are the basic assumptions about beliefs, values and principles used to guide choices. The ethical decision-making framework as the output of the study is inspired by the 3-dimensional pyramid figure. This system enhances the identification of the ethical framework of the managers as they are faced with ethical dilemmas. The system enclosed the five ethics which are founded and anchored based on the existing ethical and moral theories and principles. The ethical decision-making system as guided by the framework included the Daft's domain of ethical management and other ethical theories and principles as well as the five domains of Staratt, Shapiro, Stefkovich and Furman with the five ethic and each domain encloses certain ethic.Keywords: MODEL-FRAMEWORK, ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING, HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS (HEIs)
(Author portrait)
DICKSON P. PAGENTE, LPT, PhD finished his doctorate degree in applied linguistics at the University of Mindanao, Davao City, Philippines. Currently, he is an associate professor and the research director of San Agustin Institute of Technology, Valencia City, Bukidnon, Philippines. His research interests include language education, Philippine languages, stylistics, lexicostatistics, and social science research.

最近チェックした商品