- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > ドイツ書
- > Social Sciences, Jurisprudence & Economy
- > Jurisprudence & Law
- > trade & commercial lawindustrial law & social law
基本説明
本書は出版社が変わったためISBNが9783704662378に変更されました。変更後のISBNでご注文下さい。
Winkler uses the SPE (Societas Privata Europaea) to look at the arising notion of a regulatory competition in European corporate law.
Full Description
Claudia Winkler uses the proposed European private limited liability company (Societas Privata Europaea - SPE) as an occasion to take a fresh and critical look at the arising notion of regulatory competition in European corporate law. The SPE is the newest attempt of the European Union to support union-wide corporate mobility of small and medium enterprises, following the liberalizing line of the ECJ's case law from Centros to Cartesio. The author defines regulatory competition as an active competition between legislators endeavoring to provide the most efficient and attractive company law, complemented by a dynamic demand by companies in search of the most favorable corporate statute. Winkler shows why regulatory competition is still only a myth in European corporate law and concludes that even the SPE would most likely not boost such a development but rather hinder it in its entirety.
Contents
A. TABLE OF CONTENTS.- B. INTRODUCTION.- C. THE SOCIETAS PRIVATA EUROPAEA (SPE) .- I. Aspirations and Backgrounds of the Statute.- II. The Historical Development.- III. The Proposed Statutes.- 1. The Commission's Proposed SPE-Regulation of 25 June 2008 (SPE-R).- 2. The Parliament Resolution of 10 March 2009 (SPE-PR).- 3. The Czech Presidency Position of 27 April 2009 (SPE-CP).- 4. The Swedish Presidency Position of 27 November 2009 (SPE-SP).- 5. Hungarian Presidency Compromise Proposal of 23 May 2011 (SPE-HP).- 6. Evaluation of the Proposals and Outlook.- A. TABLE OF CONTENTS.- B. INTRODUCTION.- C. THE SOCIETAS PRIVATA EUROPAEA (SPE).- I. Aspirations and Backgrounds of the Statute.- II. The Historical Development.- III. The Proposed Statutes.- 1. The Commission's Proposed SPE-Regulation of 25 June 2008 (SPE-R).- a. Characteristics.- b. Formation.- c. Minimum Capital and Capital Requirements.- d. Internal Organisation of the SPE.- e. Employee Participation.- f. Seat State Statute and Seat Transfer.- 2. The Parliament Resolution of 10 March 2009 (SPE-PR).- a. Characteristics.- b. Formation.- c. Cross-Border Element.- d. Minimum Capital and Capital Requirements.- e. Employee Participation.- 3. The Czech Presidency Position of 27 April 2009 (SPE-CP).- a. Characteristics.- b. Formation.- c. Cross-Border Element.- d. Minimum Capital and Capital Requirements.- e. Employee Participation and Internal Organisation.- 4. The Swedish Presidency Position of 27 November 2009 (SPE-SP).- a. Characteristics.- b. Formation.- c. Cross-Border Element.- d. Minimum Capital and Capital Requirements.- 5. Hungarian Presidency Compromise Proposal of 23 May 2011 (SPE-HP).- a. Seat of the SPE.- b. Minimum Capital Requirement.- c. Employee Participation.- d. Rejection in the Competitiveness Council on 30/31 May 2011.- 6. Evaluation of the Proposals and Outlook.- a. Paradigm Shifts in European Corporat Law.- b. Characteristics.- c. Cross-Border Element.- d. Minimum Capital and Capital Requirements.- e. Employee Participation.- f. Seat.- g. Outlook.- D. REGULATORY COMPETITION IN EUROPEAN CORPORATE LAW.- I. An Appraisal of Company Law and Corporate Mobility in the European Union.- 1. Company Law in the European Union.- 2. Conflict of Laws.- 3. Corporate Mobility in the European Union -- an Introductory Outline of the Status Quo.- a. New Incorporations.- b. Sole Transfer of the Administrative Centre.- c. Sole Transfer of the Statutory Seat.- d. Identity Preserving Seat Transfer (the Cartesio Solution).- e. Summary.- f. Imperative Requirements in the General Interest.- g. The Cross-Border Merger Directive.- h. Excursus: Proposed Directive on the Cross-Border Transfer of the Registered Office.- II. Definition of Regulatory Competition.- III. The Development of Regulatory Competition.- 1. The Impact of European Legislative Measures on Regulatory Competition.- 2. The ECJ Landmark Decisions on Corporate Mobility.- IV. Framework Conditions for Regulatory Competition in European Corporate Law.- 1. Is Regulatory Competition Possible in European Corporate Law?.- 2. Freedom of Establishment.- 3. Conflict of Laws.- 4. Offer and Demand.- 5. Conclusio and Perspective of Framework Conditions for Regulatory Competition.- V. Does Regulatory Competition Exist in European Corporate Law? .- 1. Supply and Demand.- 2. Empirical Evidence for Demand -- are Companies Emigrating?.- 3. Empirical Evidence for Supply -- are the Member States Competing?.- 4. Evaluation of the Empirical Evidence for Supply and Demand .- VI. Desirability of Regulatory Competition in European Corporate Law .- 1. Harmonisation.- 2. Regulatory Competition.- 3. The Need for a Meta-Framework.- VII. Prospects of Regulatory Competition within the European Union.- VIII. Concluding Assessment on Regulatory Competition.- E. THE INFLUENCE OF THE SOCIETAS PRIVATA EUROPAEA ON EUROPEAN CORPORATE LAW.- I. Will the SPE enter into Competition with the National Limited Liability Companies?.- 1. Classification of the SPE within the Framework of European Company Law.- 2. Areas Relevant to Regulatory Competition in the Proposals for an SPE Statute.- II. Will the SPE be able to trigger Regulatory Competition within European Corporate Law?.- 1. Horizontal Competition: Regulatory Competition between the Member States.- 2. Vertical Competition: Regulatory Competition between the European Legislator and the Member States.- 3. Conclusion.- F. LIST OF REFERENCES.
