- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > ドイツ書
- > Social Sciences, Jurisprudence & Economy
- > Jurisprudence & Law
- > general surveys & lexicons
Description
Eine Analyse der Umweltrechtsprechung des europäischen und interamerikanischen Menschenrechtssystems zeigt, dass keine Notwendigkeit für die Eigenrechtsidee besteht. Eine Analyse der Rechtsordnungen in Ecuador, Bolivien, Neuseeland, Kolumbien, Indien und Spanien zeigt jedoch, dass diese eine nützliche Ergänzung zum anthropozentrischen Rechtsschutz darstellt. Die Ergebnisse werden in das indirekte, das kombinierte und das rechtsbasierte Schutzmodell systematisiert. »Rights of Nature. A Necessary or Useful Expansion to Anthropocentic Legal Protection? An Analysis from a Comparative Law and Environmental Ethical Perspective«: An analysis of environmental case law within the European and Inter-American human rights systems shows that there is no need for the concept of rights for nature. However, an analysis of the legal systems in Ecuador, Bolivia, New Zealand, Colombia, India, and Spain reveals that this concept serves as a useful complement to anthropocentric legal protection. The findings are systematized into the indirect, combined, and rights-based protection models. My Hanh Pham studied law at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich and the University of Helsinki. She was then a research assistant to Professor Dr. Dr. Patricia Wiater at the Chair for Public Law, Public International Law and Human Rights at University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU). As part of her doctoral studies, she also conducted research under Professor Klaus Bosselmann at the New Zealand Centre for Environmental Law at the University of Auckland. She received her doctorate from FAU in 2025. She completed her legal clerkship in the district of the Munich Higher Regional Court.
