- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > ドイツ書
- > Humanities, Arts & Music
- > Religion & Theology
- > christianity
Description
The filioque controversy between Rome and Byzantium was by far not concluded with the events of 1054, but continued as a multi-faceted pneumatological discourse. In the 12th/13th century, panoplies, treatises, lists of errors and other polemical genres were produced. These debates reached a temporary climax in the years following the ephemeral Union of Lyon (1274). Numerous Byzantines vehemently rejected Latin pneumatology without agreeing on a unified counter-proposal. From then on, the Filioque controversy was channelled into a primarily internal Byzantine discourse, which, in the context of pneumatological questions, argued over interpretations of history, hermeneutics of tradition and the Byzantine self-image per se.The pneumatological design of Patriarch Gregory II of Cyprus (1283-1289) emerged in this context. His synodal Tomus (1285) provided answers to the theological challenges of his time with the help of traditional quotations from the Fathers. Gregory confronted the Latin filioque not only with a contradiction, but also with a positive counter-proposal. The latter is receiving increasing attention in ecumenical discussions and is presented, analysed and discussed in detail in this study. Konstantin Wendel, geboren 1994 in Luckenwalde, studierte Evangelische Theologie in Berlin, Jerusalem und Göttingen. Sein Forschungsinteresse umfasst dogmengeschichtliche und kontroverstheologische Themen. Heute arbeitet er als Vikar der Evangelischen Kirche in Ber
