Full Description
In the wake of the civil disturbances following the
Southport tragedy, any mention of the phrase 'two-tier policing' has been
dismissed. This report questions why progressive political leaders refer to it
as the language of far-right thugs, the media cast it as 'myth', and a
high-profile Select Committee refers to it as an 'unsubstantiated' and
'disgraceful' concept in relation to the police.
The government has since been forced to introduce emergency
legislation precisely to ensure that two-tier justice doesn't become embedded
in court sentencing guidelines - while separately, the Prime Minister felt
obligated to announce a national inquiry into grooming gangs, based, in part,
on the question of whether public authorities took appropriate actions to
protect young white girls as a consequence of concerns over
racial or ethnic sensitivities.
Prior to and especially since the disorder following the
Southport tragedy, there has been a growing public debate as to whether British
policing demonstrates impartiality when dealing with crime and protests and
public disorder amongst different communities or groups.
This report by Hardeep Singh examines whether a 'tiered'
approach goes to the heart of policing and the wider criminal justice system.
After all, impartiality had always been written into the historic founding
principles of policing: 'To seek and preserve public favour, not by pandering
to public opinion; but by constantly demonstrating absolutely impartial service
to law'.
But are some groups, like progressivists, climate change
activists, or ethnic minorities, given a wider berth than others? Are police
operational decisions (or prosecution decisions) influenced by the community
being policed? Does political pressure influence the police to be more lenient
with left-wing protestors, compared to right-wing groups? Is there the
potential for political interference, which might result in a prioritised
policing response?
The apparent differential treatment, along ethnic and
religious lines, for incidents in Birmingham, Bristol, Harehills (Leeds), the
Notting Hill Carnivals, plus the various Israel-Palestinian protests, combined
with the tiered policing approach towards faith groups in the reporting of
non-crime hate incidents, all underline this continuing trend.
Drawing upon numerous case studies, this report aims to
delve into some of these important but admittedly contentious issues. It is an
attempt to shed some light on whether the widely held perception of two-tier,
or multi-tier, policing is warranted.
