Full Description
Our knowledge of crime is based on three types of sources: the criminal justice system, victims, and offenders. For technological and other reasons the criminal justice system produces an increasing stream of information on crime. The rise of the victimization survey has given the victims a much larger role in our study of crime. There is, however, no concomitant development regarding offenders. This is unfortunate because offenders are the experts when it comes to offending.In order to understand criminal behavior, we need their perspective.
This is not always a straightforward process, however, and information from offenders is often unreliable. This book is about what we can do to maximise the validity of what offenders tell us about their offending. Renowned experts from various countries present their experiences and insights, with a clear focus on methodological issues of fieldwork among various types of offender populations. Each contribution deals with with a few central issues:
How can offenders be motivated to participate in research?
How can offenders be motivated to tell the truth on their offending?
How can the information that offenders provide be checked and validated?
What can we learn from offenders that cannot be accessed from other sources?
With the aim of obtaining valid and reliable information, how, where and under which conditions should we observe offenders and talk to them?
Contents
Foreword PrefacePart 1: Setting the Stage 1. Learning About Crime from Criminals: Editor's Introduction 2. Misinformation, Misunderstanding and Misleading as Validity Threats to Offenders' Accounts of Offending 3. Apprehending Criminals: The Impact of Law on Offender-based ResearchPart 2: Prison Settings 4. Interviewing the Incarcerated: Pitfalls and Promises5. Interviewing and Validity Issues in Self-report Research with Incarcerated Offenders: The Quebec Inmate Survey6. Beyond the Interview: Complementing and Validating Accounts of Incarcerated Violent OffendersPart 3: Field Settings 7. Method, Actor and Context Triangulations: Knowing What Happened During Criminal Events and the Motivations for Getting Involved 8. Repeat, Triangulate and Reflect: Ethnographic Validity in a Study on Urban Minority Youth 9. Getting Good Data from People that Do Bad Things: Effective Methods and Techniques for Conducting Research with Hard-to-Reach and Hidden PopulationsPart 4: Social Categories of Offenders and Researchers 10. The Impact of Gender when Interviewing 'Offenders on Offending' 11. Talking to Snakeheads: Methodological Considerations for Research on Chinese Human Smuggling 12. Blue-collar, White-collar: Crimes and MistakesPart 5: Learning About the Actn 13. Research on Residential Burglary: Ways of Improving Validity and Participants' Recall when Gathering Data 14. The Use of Maps in Offender Interviewing 15. Interviewing Offenders in a Penitentiary Environment and the Use of Mental Maps During Interviews 16. Validating Offenders' Accounts: Learning from Offender Interviews with Bank Robbers in Austrian Prisons
