No Place for Ethics : Judicial Review, Legal Positivism, and the Supreme Court of the United States (The Fairleigh Dickinson University Press Series in Law, Culture, and the Humanities)

個数：

No Place for Ethics : Judicial Review, Legal Positivism, and the Supreme Court of the United States (The Fairleigh Dickinson University Press Series in Law, Culture, and the Humanities)

Hill, T. Patrick

ウェブストア価格 ¥22,973（本体¥20,885）
Fairleigh Dickinson University Press（2021/08発売）
外貨定価 US$ 111.00
ポイント 208pt

提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
【重要ご説明事項】
1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて

【入荷遅延について】
世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。

◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。

◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。

製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版／ページ数 240 p.
言語 ENG
商品コード 9781683933236
DDC分類 174.30973

Full Description

In No Place for Ethics, Hill argues that contemporary judicial review by the Supreme Court rests on its mistaken positivist understanding of law—law simply because so ordered—as something separate from ethics. To assert any relation between the two is to contaminate both, either by turning law into an arm of ethics, or making ethics an expression of law.

To address this mistake, Hill contends that an understanding of natural law theory provides the basis for a constitutive relation between ethics and law without confusing their distinct role in answering the basic question, how should I behave in society?

To secure that relation, the Court has an overriding responsibility when carrying out its review to do so with reference to normative ethics from which the US Constitution is derived and to which it is accountable. While the Constitution confirms, for example, the liberty interests of individuals, it does not originate those interests which have their origin in human rights that long preceded it.

Essential to this argument is an appreciation of ethics as objective and normatively based on principles, like that of justice and truth that ought to inform human behavior at its very springs. Applied in an analysis of five major Supreme Court cases, this appreciation of ethics reveals how wrongly decided these cases are.

Introduction: Ethics and Law, A Complicated but Necessary Relationship

OneLochner v. New York, 198 US 45 (1905): Public Health and. the Constitutionally Protected Right of Contract between an Employer and Employees

TwoDeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989): Liberty and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

ThreeNew York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992): Wither the Social Contract?

FourFDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, 529 U.S 98 (2000): FDA Uses the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act (FDCA) of 1938 to Claim Regulatory Authority Over Tobacco Products

FiveUnited States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000): Legal Formalism versus Human Rights, Federal Civil Remedies and the Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence