Improving America's Schools Together : How District-University Partnerships and Continuous Improvement Can Transform Education

個数:

Improving America's Schools Together : How District-University Partnerships and Continuous Improvement Can Transform Education

  • オンデマンド(OD/POD)版です。キャンセルは承れません。
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Paperback:紙装版/ペーパーバック版/ページ数 380 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9781538173220
  • DDC分類 371.2070973

Full Description

Improving America's Schools Together: How District-University Partnerships and Continuous ImprovementCan Transform Education is the first definitive text on continuous improvement in school district-university partnerships, covering improvement methods, theory, research, and real cases across the country with practical improvement tools that can be adapted to any setting. Through an array of in-depth stories of district-university partnerships, the book aims to demonstrate how improvement science—as a shared method—can guide institutions of higher education and their local education agency partners to enact the types of infrastructures that foster leaders and educators capable of enhancing students' learning outcomes and opportunity structures. Among other topics, readers will benefit from reading about how these partnerships developed course and program offerings for aspiring urban school leaders centered on local problems of practice; strengthened improvement capabilities within districts and schools; leveraged improvement science to transform how teachers are professionally supported; and spanned institutional boundaries through shared tools, frameworks, and practices. Through rich stories and detailed artifacts, including protocols, MOUs, and other practical tools, the authors provide deep insight and practical guidance on the mechanics of place-based, problem-focused, and improvement-minded district-university partnerships. Readers can assess their readiness and ability to work in such ways; identify the constraining and enabling conditions in their locales; and recognize the kinds of tools, resources, and strategies that allow for mutually-beneficial collaborations.

Contents

Foreword

Anthony Bryk

Introduction: Getting to Mutual-Benefit Partnerships

Navigating the Tangles of Inter-Organizational Work

"It Takes a Village" to Redress Inequities

The Improvement Leadership Education and Development (iLEAD) Network

Social Learning Theory and Culture

Moving Beyond Transactional Relationships

Trading Zones and Boundary Objects

iLEAD's Developmental Progressions Framework as a Boundary Object

The Desiderata to Sustain Trading Zones

Continuous Improvement
Equity
Coordination
Capacity Building

Conclusion

References

Section I: Improvement Methods, Equity, and Problems of Practice in Local Context

1 - Braiding Improvement into the Fabric of District Leadership Preparation and Practice

University of Virginia and Chesterfield County Public Schools

David Eddy-Spicer, Tinkhani White, and Michelle Beavers

Partnership Context

University of Virginia
Chesterfield County Public Schools

An Educational Leadership Preparation Partnership Emerges

The "Improvement Sandwich": Cooperation into Coordination

CCPS Strand: Focus on Programmatic Equity and School Improvement Planning
UVA Strand: Redesigning the M.Ed. Program

Field-Based Learning as Boundary Infrastructure

Securing the Braid: Coordination into Collaboration

Deepening Coordination Across School Levels and With Central Office in CCPS

Collaborating across School Levels in CCPS
Collaboration in Teaching and Learning at UVA

Results: Organizational Practice & Partnership

Conclusions and Lessons Learned

CCPS Lessons Learned

From Professional Development to Intrapreneurial Collective Learning

UVA Lessons Learned

A&S Faculty Collective Learning

Partnership Lessons Learned: Co-Development of Leadership Pedagogies
Essential Lessons of Partnership Work

Questions for Discussion

References

2 - A University-School District Collaboration to Improve Equity- and Inquiry-Driven School Leadership

Fordham University and Bronx School Districts 9 & 11

Margaret Terry Orr, Kris DeFilippis, Meisha Ross Porter, and Elizabeth Leisy Stosich

Context

Problem

Challenges, Solutions and Evidence

Development
Advanced Leadership Preparation

Redesigning Fordham's EdD Program
Creating a Bronx EdD Cohort in Equity-Focused Improvement Science

Leadership Development

Assistant Principal Math Networked Improvement Community
Creating Positive Change through the Bronx Academic Response Team Initiative
Principal Equity Improvement Networked Improvement Communities

Conclusions and Lessons Learned

Questions for Discussion

References

3 - Moving a Partnership from Itinerant to Integral: Using Improvement Science as a Catalyst for Change in Leadership Preparation & Induction

George Mason University and Fairfax County Public Schools

Samantha Viano, Farnoosh Shahrokhi, Regina Biggs, Natasha Saunders, Claire Silva, and Paige Whitlock

Context

EDLE Program at GMU
FCPS
FCPS and GMU Partnering Prior to iLEAD
Joining Together as iLEAD Partners

Problems

Stagnant Progress on School Improvement
Mismatch Between EDLE Leadership Preparation and FCPS Practice

Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence

Improvement Science as Our Catalyzing Agent to Come Together

Making Improvement Science EDLE's Signature Pedagogy

EDLE Faculty's Introduction to Improvement Science
Commitment to Improvement Science through Curriculum Development

Diverse Approaches to Supporting the Use of Improvement Science in FCPS

Professional Development Opportunities
School-Based Leadership Induction
Title I Comprehensive Needs Assessment

Our Partnership Driven Initiative: Piloting an Improvement Science Approach to School Improvement

Phase 1: Cultivating Cultures of Continuous Improvement, 2019-20 School Year
Phase 2: Redressing Inequities, 2020-21 School Year
Phase 3: Spreading What Works, 2021-22 School Year
Showcasing Our Joint Efforts

Synergy between Leadership Preparation and School Improvement

Conclusions and Lessons Learned

Starting with a Foundational Relationship to Build upon
Garner Immediate Excitement about Improvement Science
Leverage Eagerness and Capacity to Make Time for Collaboration
Concluding Thoughts
Attending to the Mission of our Partnership Work

Questions for Discussion

References

4 - Improvement Science as a Collaborative Effort for Equity

High Tech High and High Tech High Graduate School of Education

Julia Jacobsen and Diana Cornejo-Sanchez

Context

High Tech High & the High Tech High Graduate School of Education

Problems

Induction as a Lever for Teacher Retention
Experimenting with Improvement in Teacher Induction

Challenges, Solutions and Evidence

Challenge #1: Entry Planning that Incorporates Continuous Improvement

Root Cause Analysis
Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycles
Sharing Learning

Challenge #2: Operating in a One-Year Time Frame
Challenge #3: Developing the Capacity of Improvement Coaches

Deficit Thinking
Compliance Orientation
Improving Coach Development
Facilitating Continuous Improvement for Equity
Induction Improvement Coach Summit
Impact

Conclusions and Lessons Learned

CI Can Be an Effective Framework for Adaptive Learning
The Importance of Improvement Science in our own Program Processes
Developing New Organizational Capacity for Continuous Improvement

Teachable Moments

How Might Improvement Processes Foster Connection and Belonging?
How Can Both the Process and the Outcome of Improvement Efforts Support Equity?
How Can We Develop Sustainable Improvement Efforts?

How Can Improvement Science Help Organizations Grow Toward a Common Mission and Develop Concrete Understandings?

Questions for Discussion

References

Section II: A New Kind of Partnership: Continuous Improvement as an Animating Force

5 -From a Transactional Relationship to a Transformational Partnership

University of Maryland College Park and Prince George's County Public Schools

Segun Eubanks, Jean Snell, Doug Anthony, Charoscar Coleman, Felice Desouza, Kara Miley-Libby, and Christine M. Neumerski

Context

Not Your Father's MOU
The Back Story: People Building Trust, Institutions Leading Change

A Change in Perspective
PGCPS Initiates a Catalyst for Change - the EdD in School System Leadership
UMD Initiates a Catalyst for Change: The Ceii
iLEAD Initiates a Catalyst for Change: Getting to the Work of Improvement
Getting to Work: Our First Problem of Practice

Problems

A Shared Problem of Practice: Putting the "Improvement" in the School Improvement Process
Leveraging the New Strategic Plan

Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence

Improvement Science as a Shared Methodology and "Solution"

The Partnership "Solution" to the Challenge of District Capacity Building with SPPing

Looking Forward to Future Work: The Launch of 2 Partnership Networked Improvement Communities
Showing Evidence of Partnership Impact

Evidence of Engagement and Commitment is Strong and Growing
Growth on the iLEAD Developmental Progressions
Emerging Data of Change in Systems Practice

Lessons Learned

Key Learning #1: Building Strong Relationships is the Starting Point
Key Learning #2: Focus on Problems of Practice and Stay Prepared for Change

Teachable Moments

You're Not Really Married if You Don't Have the Paper
Adapt, Don't Abandon
Shifts Happen
Just Do Something

References

6 - Redesigning School Staffing Models through Team-Based Residencies

Arizona State University and Avondale Elementary School District

Betsy Hargrove, Christina Flesher, Nicole L. Thompson, and Carole Basile

The Next Education Workforce: A Growing Idea

Context: MLFTC and AESD Partnership

Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence Based Teacher Preparation

Challenges for AESD
Changes and Vision at MLFTC
A Renewed Partnership
Serendipity and Early Models
Improvement Science: Planning, Doing, Studying Acting

Residents
Lead Teachers
Site Lead
Instructional Configurations
Studying the Innovative Approach

Lessons Learned

Invested and Involved Leadership
Systems and Structures
Challenges of Teams
Developmental Progressions and Growth in Collaboration
Characteristics of Successful Teams

Conclusion

Afterword: Beyond Teacher Preparation

Questions for Discussion

References

7 - District-University Partnerships for Continuous Improvement: How Can UM Help? University of Mississippi and Oxford School District

Denise A. Soares, Mark E. Deschaine, W. Bradley Roberson, David Rock, Marni Harrington, and Brian Harvey

Context: Beginning the Partnership Work

The Achievement Gap Project

Chronic Absenteeism PDSA Cycle

Plan
Do
Study
Act
Building Capacity
Spread and Scale Progress

OSD Improvement Science Problems of Practice

Passion Professional Development PDSA Cycle

Plan
Do
Study
Act

Youth Truth Survey PDSA Cycle

Plan
Do
Study
Act

UM-SOE Improvement Science Problems of Practice

Graduate Studies Office PDSA Cycle

Plan
Do
Study
Act

UM-SOE Dean's Office Staff PDSA Cycle

Plan
Do
Study
Act

UM-Developmental Progression

The "How" of Partnerships (Partnership Mechanisms)
Expectations, Sustainability, Norms & Routines
Vision for the Future
NCSUP Mission

Lessons Learned

Questions for Discussion

References

8 - Equity-Focused Improvement Science

Portland State University and Portland Public Schools

Susan P. Carlile, Deborah S. Peterson, and Tania McKey

Key Leaders

Professor of Practice Susan Carlile
Associate Professor Emerita Dr. Deborah S. Peterson
Assistant Professor and Senior Director of Humanities Dr. Tania McKey

Context of the PSU-PPS Partnership

Portland State University
Portland Public Schools

Chronology of Improvement Science Efforts

Networked Improvement Communities

Partner Districts
Newberg School District (NSD)
Changes in the Partnership with the Newberg School District

The New District Partnership: Portland Public Schools

Challenges and Solutions

Tools to Identify Next Steps

Progress (Strengths) at the Partnership Level
Progress (Strengths) at PPS
Progress (Strengths) at the PSU Level
Areas of Focus (Challenges) at the Partnership Level
Areas of Focus (Challenges) in PPS
Area of Focus (Challenge) in PSU

Contextual Complexities

Theory of Improvement

Program Redesign
Redesign PPS Practices for Principal Support
Hire Scholarly Practitioners as Principal Preparation Cohort Leaders
PPS Hires PSU Principal Licensure Completers

Lessons Learned

Next Steps

Conclusion

Questions for Discussion

References

Section III: Partnerships Ain't Easy: Learning from Short-Term Efforts and Long-Term Sustainability

9 - Shared Goals, Methods, and Learning: Partnering for Equity-focused, Systems-level Improvement

University of Denver and Denver Public Schools

Erin Anderson and Sandra Lochhead

Context

Problem

District Context

Sustainable Improvement in the District

Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence

Shared Goals: Embedded Process Over External Program

Where Did We Start?
What Steps Happened Along the Way?
Where Are We Now?

Shared Methodology: The Design Improvement for Equity (DI4E) Model

Where Did We Start?
What Steps Happened Along the Way?
Where Are We Now?

Shared Learning: Shared Research Agenda in a Research-Practice Partnership

Where Did We Start?
What Steps Happened Along the Way?
Where Are We Now?

Summary of Impact

Conclusions and Lessons Learned

Lesson 1: Be Clear About your "Why"—Your North Star Guides the Way
Lesson 2: Create a Shared Theory of Improvement for your Partnership Work and Use It as a Map to Reach your Destination
Lesson 3: Interdependence Was Essential to the Partnership and to Increasing Equity in the System
Lesson 4: Be Disciplined about a Shared Learning Agenda or Research Plan
Lesson 5: Despite Shared Values, Norms, and Goals, There Are Still Organizational Values and Conditions That Will Limit Systems Change

Questions for Discussion

References

10 - Organizational Changes' Impacts on University-District Partnership Development

University of South Carolina and K-12 School District in South Carolina

Kathleen M. W. Cunningham, Peter Moyi, and Barnett Berry

Context

University of South Carolina College of Education
The Partnership Between CoE/EDLP and MCSD

Developing and Sustaining a District-University Partnership

Two Partnership Frameworks: iLEAD's Developmental Progressions and the Stage Model

Developmental Progressions (Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2020)
Stage Model (Trubowitz, 1986)

Partnership Journey

Improvement Work Begins
Establishment of a Core Improvement Team

Organizational Progress: Partnership
Organizational Progress: UofSC (i.e., CoE and EDLP)

Challenges

Challenge 1: Multiple, Evolving Goals
Challenge 2: Logistics (Distance, Funding, Time-Competing Priorities)
Challenge 3: Personnel and Leadership Transitions
Challenge 4: COVID-19 Pandemic

Conclusions and Lessons Learned

Consideration 1: Clearly Defined Goals and Expectations
Consideration 2: Core Partnership Team with Consistent Membership, Leadership, and Active Commitment
Consideration 3: Lean on a Continuous Improvement Mindset to Reflect and Learn

Questions for Discussion

References

11 - Preparing Principals for Urban Schools: The Challenge of Equitable Outcomes at Scale

Universityof Illinois Chicago and Chicago Public Schools

Steve Tozer, Peter Martinez, Cynthia K. Barron, Shelby Cosner, Zipporah Hightower, Janice Jackson, David Mayrowetz, Sam Whalen, and Paul Zavitkovsky

Partnership Context: Chicago school reform and UIC's "Urban Mission"

Chicago School Reform and State Legislation
The Principal Preparation Program Design and Redesign: 11 Key Components
Impact of Program Design and Redesign
"We Want to Be as Good as People Think We Are"

Using the Development Progressions to Tell the CPS/UIC Partnership Story

From MOU to Vendor Contract
A Missing Objective?
Preparation of CPS Principal Supervisors (Network Chiefs) and Central Office Personnel
A Next Edge of Growth

Developing Capacity as a District Partner: the UIC Ed.D. Program

Elaborations and Qualifications on the IHE Narrative

Vision, Systems, and Above All, People
Our First Targeted Program Hire
Building the Team
Leadership Coaches as Boundary Spanners
Creating "Boundary Objects"
Next Edges of Growth
Need for New Resources

How Did the District Sustain its Share of the Partnership for 20 Years across 9 CEOs?

Conclusions and Lessons Learned

1.Equity

2.Partnership

3.Leadership Development: Vision, Systems, and People

4.Continuous Improvement

Questions for Discussion

References

Conclusion: How Continuous Improvement Partnerships Can Transform Education

Louis Gomez and Manuelito Biag

Tightly Tethered Mutuality

Attending to the How of Partnerships

The Role of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching

Building a Strong Field: Infrastructure that Recasts Partnerships

Creating Social Infrastructure for Collective Action

Looking Forward: The Sustainability of Mutually Beneficial Partnerships for Leadership and Continuous Improvement

References

References

Index

About the Contributors

最近チェックした商品