Full Description
How does the canon of Scripture fit together?
For evangelical Christians, there is no question about the authority of Scripture and its testimony to the centrality of Jesus Christ in God's salvation plan. But several questions remain: How do the Old Testament and New Testament relate to each other? What is the relationship among the biblical covenants? How should Christians read and interpret Scripture in order to do justice to both its individual parts and its whole message? How does Israel relate to the church?
In this Spectrum Multiview volume, readers will find four contributors who explore these complex questions. The contributors each make a case for their own view—representing two versions of covenantal theology and two versions of dispensational theology—and then respond to the others' views to offer an animated yet irenic discussion on the continuity of Scripture.
Views and Contributors:
Covenant Theology: Michael S. Horton, Gresham Machen Professor of Systematic Theology and Apologetics, Westminster Seminary California
Progressive Covenantalism: Stephen J. Wellum, professor of Christian theology, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
Progressive Dispensationalism: Darrell L. Bock, Senior Research Professor of New Testament Studies, Dallas Theological Seminary
Traditional Dispensationalism: Mark A. Snoeberger, professor of systematic theology and apologetics, Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary
Spectrum Multiview Books offer a range of viewpoints on contested topics within Christianity, giving contributors the opportunity to present their position and also respond to others in this dynamic publishing format.
Contents
Acknowledgments
Introduction: Four Views on the Systems of Theology: Brent E. Parker and Richard J. Lucas
Main Essays
Covenant Theology: Michael S. Horton
Progressive Covenantalism: Stephen J. Wellum
Progressive Dispensationalism: Darrell L. Bock
Traditional Dispensationalism: Mark A. Snoeberger
Responses
A Covenant Theology Response: Michael S. Horton
A Progressive Covenantalism Response: Stephen J. Wellum
A Progressive Dispensationalism Response: Darrell L. Bock
A Traditional Dispensationalism Response: Mark A. Snoeberger
