Full Description
Juries have a tremendous amount of power and responsibility. They determine the outcomes of trials, including whether a defendant is found guilty or not guilty and, in many cases, what the penalty will be. With the authority to deprive citizens of their freedom and potentially their lives, a fair trial requires that juries function as they should-without bias.
But do they function this way? Are juries capable of disregarding inadmissible evidence? Can they understand the instructions that they are given by the judge? And if not, what safeguards or changes would help? Research on juries once served as a pillar of psychological scholarship, but publication of such research has slowed considerably in recent years. This volume summarizes what is known about the psychology of juries and makes a strong call to arms for more research.
Margaret Bull Kovera and other esteemed jury scholars identify important, yet understudied, topics at the intersection of psychology and law, review what research is currently available on the topics, and then suggest new research questions that would advance the field. Furthermore, the authors evaluate the relative importance of research methods that emphasize generalizability versus tight experimental control.
This book presents a comprehensive survey of the literature on jury behavior and decision making and offers a robust agenda to keep researchers busy in years to come.
Contents
Contributors
Preface
Introduction: An Overview
Margaret Bull Kovera
Part I: Important but Understudied Topics in Jury Research
Chapter : Integrating Individual and Group Models of Juror Decision Making
Lora M. Levett and Dennis Devine
Chapter 2: The Effects of Collaborative Remembering on Trial Verdicts
William Hirst and Charles B. Stone
Chapter 3: Integrating Concepts of Trial Advocacy Into Juror Decision-Making Research
Christina A. Studebaker
Chapter 4: Studying the Effects of Race, Ethnicity, and Culture on Jury Behavior
Jennifer S. Hunt
Chapter 5: Juries Compared With What? The Need for a Baseline and Attention to Real World Complexity
Jennifer K. Robbennolt and Theodore Eisenberg
Chapter : Global Juries: A Plan for Research
Valerie P. Hans, Hiroshi Fukurai, Sanja Kutnjak Ivković, and Jaihyun Park
Part II: Validity and Trial Simulation Methodology
Chapter 7: Jury Simulation Goals
Jonathan J. Koehler and John B. Meixner, Jr.
Chapter 8: Managing Different Aspects of Validity in Trial Simulation Research
Daniel A. Krauss and Joel D. Lieberman
Chapter 9: Jury Simulation Research: Pros, Cons, Trends, and Alternatives
Brian H. Bornstein
Chapter : How Typical is Lockhart v. McCree? Ecological Validity Concerns in Court Opinions
Mary R. Rose
Part III: Synthesis and Future Directions
Chapter : Suggested Do's and Don'ts for Future Jury Research: A Swan Song
Norbert L. Kerr
Conclusion: The Future of Jury Research
Margaret Bull Kovera
Index
About the Editor
