省略と非文的会話 Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy Vol.81) （2004. VI, 262 p.）

省略と非文的会話<br>Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy Vol.81) （2004. VI, 262 p.）

個数：

省略と非文的会話
Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy Vol.81) （2004. VI, 262 p.）

Ed. by R. Elugardo and R. J. Stainton

ウェブストア価格 ¥23,074（本体¥20,977）
SPRINGER NETHERLANDS（2004発売）
外貨定価 US$ 109.99
ポイント 209pt

提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
【重要ご説明事項】
1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて

【入荷遅延について】
世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。

◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。

◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。

製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版／ページ数 262 p.
言語 ENG
商品コード 9781402022999

基本説明

The papers in this volume address two main topics: Q1: What is the nature, and especially the scope, of ellipsis in natural language? Q2: What are the linguistic/philosophical implications of what one takes the nature/scope of ellipsis to be?

Full Description

The papers in this volume address two main topics: Q1: What is the nature, and especially the scope, of ellipsis in natural l- guage? Q2: What are the linguistic/philosophical implications of what one takes the nature/scope of ellipsis to be? As will emerge below, each of these main topics includes a large sub-part that deals speci?cally with nonsentential speech. Within the ?rst main topic, Q1, there arises the sub-issueofwhethernonsententialspeechfallswithinthescopeofellipsisornot;within the second main topic, Q2, there arises the sub-issue of what linguistic/philosophical implications follow, if nonsentential speech does/does not count as ellipsis. I. THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF ELLIPSIS A. General Issue: How Many Natural Kinds? There are many things to which the label 'ellipsis' can be readily applied. But it's quite unclear whether all of them belong in a single natural kind. To explain, consider a view, assumed in Stainton (2000), Stainton (2004a), and elsewhere. It is the view that there are fundamentally (at least) three very different things that readily get called 'ellipsis', each belonging to a distinct kind. First, there is the very broad phenomenon of a speaker omitting information which the hearer is expected to make use of in interpreting an utterance. Included therein, possibly as a special case, is the use of an abbreviated form of speech, when one could have used a more explicit expression. (See Neale (2000) and Sellars (1954) for more on this idea.

The Nature and Scope of Ellipsis.- Against Reconstruction in Ellipsis.- The Semantics of Nominal Exclamatives.- Nonsententials in Minimalism.- A Note on Alleged Cases of Nonsentential Assertion.- On the Interpretation and Performance of Non-Sentential Assertions.- Non-Sentences, Implicature, and Success in Communication.- The Link between Sentences and 'Assertion': An Evolutionary Accident?.- Implications.- Knowledge by Acquaintance and Meaning in Isolation.- Co-Extensive Theories and Unembedded Definite Descriptions.- The Ellipsis Account of Fiction-Talk.- Quinean Interpretation and Anti-Vernacularism.- Saying What You Mean: Unarticulated Constituents and Communication.