The Ethics of Medical Involvement in Capital Punishment : A Philosophical Discussion (International Library of Ethics, Law and the New Medicine Vol.18) / Gaie, Joseph B.

ホーム
> 洋書
> ドイツ書
> Social Sciences, Jurisprudence & Economy
> Jurisprudence & Law
> general surveys & lexicons

死刑への医療の介入倫理<br>The Ethics of Medical Involvement in Capital Punishment : A Philosophical Discussion (International Library of Ethics, Law and the New Medicine Vol.18) （2004. 174 p.）

個数：

死刑への医療の介入倫理
The Ethics of Medical Involvement in Capital Punishment : A Philosophical Discussion (International Library of Ethics, Law and the New Medicine Vol.18) （2004. 174 p.）

Gaie, Joseph B.

ウェブストア価格 ¥22,764（本体¥20,695）
Springer（2004発売）
外貨定価 US$ 109.99
ポイント 206pt

提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
【重要ご説明事項】
1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
2. 複数冊ご注文の場合、分割発送となる場合がございます。
3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて

【入荷遅延について】
世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。

◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。

◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。

製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版／ページ数 174 p.
言語 ENG
商品コード 9781402017643

基本説明

Uses the theories of Emmanuel Kant and John S. Mill, combined with Gerwith's principle of generic consistency, to concretize ethics in capital punishment practice.

Full Description

The morality of capital punishment has been debated for a long time. This however has 1 not resulted in the settlement of the question either way. Philosophers are still divided. In this work I am not addressing the morality of capital punishment per se. My question is different but related. It is this. Whether or not capital punishment is morally right, is it moral or immoral for medical doctors to be involved in the practice? To deal with this question I start off in Chapter One delineating the sort of involvement the medical associations consider to be morally problematic for medical doctors in capital punishment. They make a distinction between what they call 2 "medicalisation" of and "involvement" in capital punishment, and argue that there is a moral distinction between the two. Whilst it is morally acceptable for doctors to be "involved" in capital punishment, according to the medical associations, it is immoral to medicalise the practice. I clarify this position and show what moral issues arise. I then suggest that there should not be a distinction between the two. The medical associations argue that the medicalisation of capital punishment, especially the use by medical doctors of lethal injection to execute condemned prisoners is immoral and therefore should be prohibited, because it involves doctors in doing what is against the aims of medicine.

Medicalisation of Capital Punishment.- Role/Professional Versus Ordinary Morality.- The Morality of Euthanasia and Its Implications for the Medicalisation of Capital Punishment.- The Military Doctor.- Medical Involvement in the Wider Capital Punishment Process.- Kantian Theory.- Utilitarian Arguments for Medicalisation.- The Medical Doctor and a Condemned Prisoner.